Skip Navigation

Strengthening the evidence for maternal and child health programs

Find Established Evidence


Displaying records 1 through 5 (5 total).

Cammu H, Eeckhout E. A randomised controlled trial of early versus delayed use of amniotomy and oxytocin infusion in nulliparous labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103(4):313- 318.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8605126

NPM: 2: Low-Risk Cesarean Deliveries
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Active Management of Labor, PROVIDER/PRACTICE

Intervention Results:

Rate of CS higher in AMOL group vs. control group (3.9% vs. 2.6%; p>0.05)

Frigoletto FD, Lieberman E, Lang JM, et al. A clinical trial of active management of labor. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(12):745-750. doi:10.1056/nejm199509213331201

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7643880

NPM: 2: Low-Risk Cesarean Deliveries
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Childbirth Education Classes, PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Active Management of Labor, Labor Support, Midwifery

Intervention Results:

Rate of CS among protocol-eligible women lower in AMOL group vs. control group (10.9% vs. 11.5%; p>0.05) after adjustment for epidural use and adoption of final protocol (three hours for second stage of labor with epidural); (OR=0.9, 95% CI: 0.4–1.9)

López-Zeno JA, Peaceman AM, Adashek JA, Socol ML. A controlled trial of a program for the active management of labor. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(7):450-454.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1732771

NPM: 2: Low-Risk Cesarean Deliveries
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Active Management of Labor

Intervention Results:

Rate of CS lower in AMOL group vs. traditional management (10.5% vs. 14.1%; p<0.05)

Rogers R, Gilson GJ, Miller AC, Izquierdo LE, Curet LB, Qualls CR. Active management of labor: does it make a difference? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(3):599-605.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9322630

NPM: 2: Low-Risk Cesarean Deliveries
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Active Management of Labor, PROVIDER/PRACTICE

Intervention Results:

Rate of CS lower in AMOL group vs. control (7.5% vs. 11.7%; p>0.05)

Sadler LC, Davison T, McCowan LM. A randomised controlled trial and meta-analysis of active management of labour. BJOG. 2000;107(7):909-915.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/0010901564

NPM: 2: Low-Risk Cesarean Deliveries
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Active Management of Labor

Intervention Results:

Rate of CS lower in AMOL group vs. routine care (9.4% vs. 9.7%; p>0.05)
   

This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number U02MC31613, MCH Advanced Education Policy, $3.5 M. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.