Skip Navigation

Strengthening the evidence for maternal and child health programs

Find Established Evidence


Displaying records 1 through 6 (6 total).

Harrington M, Kenney GM, et al. CHIPRA Mandated Evaluation of the Children's Health Insurance Program: Final Findings. Report submitted to the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Ann Arbor, MI: Mathematica Policy Research; August 2014.

Link:

NPM: 10: Adolescent Well-Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Expanded Insurance Coverage, PAYER

Intervention Results:

Significantly higher percentage of adolescent well visits for CHIP enrollees vs children uninsured for 5-12 months in the prior year (p<.05)

Smith K, Dye C. 2012 2012 Congressionally Mandated CHIP and Medicaid Survey: Findings on Access and Use for Primary and Preventative Care Under CHIP and Medicaid. Memo to the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Planning and Evaluation. Mathematica Policy Research. December 20, 2013.

Link:

NPM: 10: Adolescent Well-Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PAYER, Expanded Insurance Coverage

Intervention Results:

Significantly higher percentage of adolescent well visits for CHIP enrollees vs children uninsured for 5-12 months in the prior year (p<.05)

Adams SH, Park MJ, Twietmeyer L, Brindis CD, Irwin CE, Jr. Association between adolescent preventive care and the role of the Affordable Care Act. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(1):43-48.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29114725

NPM: 10: Adolescent Well-Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PAYER, Expanded Insurance Coverage

Intervention Results:

Significantly higher rates of well visits (7% difference; 95% CI=1.2%-1.5%; p<.001)

Dick AW, Brach C, Allison RA, et al. SCHIP's impact in three states: how do the most vulnerable children fare? Health Aff. 2004;23(5):63-75.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15371371

NPM: 10: Adolescent Well-Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Expanded Insurance Coverage, PAYER

Intervention Results:

  • Significantly higher rates of preventive care for adolescents in Florida (0.71 vs 0.79; p<.01)
  • No significant increase in preventive care for adolescents in New York (p<.10)

Kenney G. The impacts of the State Children's Health Insurance Program on children who enroll: findings from ten states. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(4):1520-1543.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17610436

NPM: 10: Adolescent Well-Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PAYER, Expanded Insurance Coverage

Intervention Results:

Significantly higher percentage of adolescent well visits for CHIP enrollees vs children uninsured for at least 2 months in the prior year (p<.01)

Klein JD, Shone LP, Szilagyi PG, Bajorska A, Wilson K, Dick AW. Impact of the State Children's Health Insurance Program on adolescents in New York. Pediatrics. 2007;119(4):e885-892.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17403831/

NPM: 10: Adolescent Well-Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PAYER, Expanded Insurance Coverage

Intervention Results:

Significantly higher number of preventive-care visits in the insured group (8.3% difference; p=.003)
   

This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number U02MC31613, MCH Advanced Education Policy, $3.5 M. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.