|
Chaux E, Velásquez AM, Schultze‐Krumbholz A, Scheithauer H. Effects of the cyberbullying prevention program media heroes (medienhelden) on traditional bullying. Aggress Behav. 2016;42(2):157-165. Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26879895 NPM: 9: Bullying
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PARENT/FAMILY, Presentation/Meeting/Information Session/Event, CLASSROOM, Adult-led Curricular Activities/Training Intervention Results: Victimization - Traditional Bullying
- Overall results- N/A (Pairwise comparisons significance tests were not conducted for this variable, given that no significant interactions were found in the main analyses).
- Subgroups analyses were conducted based on students’ initial status in terms of their level of victimization and perpetration. For victimization, students were categorized as cybervictim only, traditional victim only, both cyber- and traditional victim, and non-victim. Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences for traditional victims only, cybervictims only, and non-victims. For traditional victims, there was a decrease for the short (p=0.01) and long (p=0.02) interventions, while the control group did not change significantly (p=0.62). For cybervictims, the control (p=0.19) and long (p=0.72) intervention conditions did not change significantly; the short intervention showed an increase (p=0.00) in traditional victimization after the intervention. For non-victims, there was an increase for both the control (p=0.04) and short (p=0.03) intervention conditions, while the long intervention did not change significantly (p=0.30).
Victimization - Cyberbullying
- Overall results- NA (Pairwise comparisons significance tests were not conducted for this variable, given that no significant interactions were found in the main analyses).
- Subgroups analyses were conducted based on students’ initial status in terms of their level of victimization and perpetration. For victimization, students were categorized as cybervictim only, traditional victim only, both cyber- and traditional victim, and nonvictim. No significant interactions were found for cyberbullying victimization.
Perpetration/Aggression - Traditional Bullying
- For traditional bullying, a significant decrease was found for students in the long intervention group, but students in the control group and in the short intervention group did not significantly change in this behavior after the implementation of the intervention.
- Subgroups analyses were conducted based on students’ initial status in terms of their level of victimization and perpetration. For perpetration, students were categorized as cyberbully only, traditional bully only, both cyber- and traditional bully, and nonbully. Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences for cyber- and traditional bullies and non-bullies. For cyber- and traditional bullies, there was a decrease in both short (p=0.00) and long (p=0.00) interventions, while the control group did not change significantly (p=0.24). For the non-bullies, both the control (p=0.01) and short (p=0.04) intervention conditions showed an increase in traditional bullying perpetration, while the long intervention did not change significantly (p=0.21).
Perpetration/Aggression - Cyberbullying
- For cyberbullying, students in the control group increased significantly in this behavior, while students in the long intervention group showed a significant decrease. Students in the short version group did not show a significant change.
- Subgroups analyses were conducted based on students’ initial status in terms of their level of victimization and perpetration. For perpetration, students were categorized as cyberbully only, traditional bully only, both cyber- and traditional bully, and non-bully. No significant interactions were found for cyberbullying perpetration.
|
