Skip Navigation

Strengthening the evidence for maternal and child health programs

Find Established Evidence


Displaying records 1 through 4 (4 total).

Davey MA, McLachlan HL, Forster D, Flood M. Influence of timing of admission in labour and management of labour on method of birth: results from a randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery (COSMOS trial). Midwifery. 2013;29(12):1297-1302.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23890679

NPM: 2: Low-Risk Cesarean Deliveries
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Continuity of Care (Caseload)

Intervention Results:

Rate of CS lower in caseload midwifery group vs. standard care group (14.6% vs. 20.2%; OR=1.49, p<0.05), though this difference was not significant after adjustment for cervical dilatation of 5cm or more upon admission, maternal age, and maternal BMI (OR=1.41, p>0.05)

Dickinson JE, Paech MJ, McDonald SJ, Evans SF. The impact of intrapartum analgesia on labour and delivery outcomes in nulliparous women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;42(1): 59-66.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11926643

NPM: 2: Low-Risk Cesarean Deliveries
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Continuity of Care (Caseload), Epidural Analgesia, Midwifery

Intervention Results:

Rate of CS lower in CMS group vs. epidural group (14.2% vs. 17.2%; p>0.05)

Gottvall K, Waldenström U, Tingstig C, Grunewald C. In-hospital birth center with the same medical guidelines as standard care: a comparative study of obstetric interventions and outcomes. Birth. 2011;38(2):120-128.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21599734

NPM: 2: Low-Risk Cesarean Deliveries
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Continuity of Care (Caseload), Labor Support, State — Place of Birth, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS, STATE, Place of Birth

Intervention Results:

Rate of CS lower in MBCC group vs. standard care group (18.9% vs. 25.6%; OR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.52–0.72); adjusted for maternal age, country of birth, education, income, smoking before pregnancy, elective cesarean section, and gestational age

Tracy SK, Welsh A, Hall B, Hartz D, Lainchbury A, Bisits A, Tracy MB. Caseload midwifery compared to standard or private obstetric care for first time mothers in a public teaching hospital in Australia: a cross sectional study of cost and birth outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:46. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-14-46

Link: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2393-14-46

NPM: 2: Low-Risk Cesarean Deliveries
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Continuity of Care (Caseload), Labor Support

Intervention Results:

Rate of CS lower in MGP group (15.4%) vs. standard hospital care (19.5%) vs. private obstetric care (17.6%); (p>0.05)
   

This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number U02MC31613, MCH Advanced Education Policy, $3.5 M. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.