Skip Navigation

Strengthening the evidence for maternal and child health programs

Find Established Evidence


Displaying records 1 through 13 (13 total).

Nguyen BH, Nguyen K, McPhee SJ, Nguyen AT, Tran DQ, Jenkins CNH. Promoting cancer prevention activities among Vietnamese physicians in California. J Cancer Educ. 2000;15(2):82-5.

Link: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08858190009528662

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Educational Material, PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Provider Reminder/Recall Systems, Provider Education

Intervention Results:

At 3-year follow-up, physician performance rates for Pap testing increased significantly (p=.004)

Vogt TM, Glass A, Glasgow RE, La Chance PA, Lichtenstein E. The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening. J Womens Health. 2003;12(8):789-98.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14588129

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Patient Reminder/Invitation, Enabling Services, Designated Clinic/Extended Hours, PROVIDER/PRACTICE

Intervention Results:

Significantly greater odds of Pap smear for women in phone/phone and letter/phone intervention groups than in control group (phone/phone OR=4.77, letter/phone OR=5.57, p<.0001)

Decker KM, Turner D, Demers AA, Martens PJ, Lambert P, Chateau D. Evaluating the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening invitation letters. J Womens Health. 2013;22(8):687-93.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23915107

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Patient Reminder/Invitation, Educational Material, PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Designated Clinic/Extended Hours

Intervention Results:

After controlling for all variables, intervention group significantly more likely to have Pap smear in the 6 months following the intervention than women in control group (OR= 2.60, 95% CI: 2.09-3.35, p<.001) in intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis

Byrnes P, McGoldrick C, Crawford M, Peers M. Cervical screening in general practice - strategies for improving participation. Aust Fam Physician. 2007;36(3):183-4, 192.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17339987

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Patient Reminder/Invitation, PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Provider Audit/Practice Audit, Nurse/Nurse Practitioner

Intervention Results:

Increase in Pap smear participation rates from 53% at baseline to 67.5% at follow-up (p<.0001)

Dorrington MS, Herceg A, Douglas K, Tongs J, Bookallil M. Increasing Pap smear rates at an urban Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service through translational research and continuous quality improvement. Aust J Prim Health. 2015;21(4):417-22.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25703868

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Patient Reminder/Invitation, Educational Material, PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Provider Reminder/Recall Systems, Quality Improvement/Practice-Wide Intervention, Designated Clinic/Extended Hours, Female Provider

Intervention Results:

Significant increase in Pap smear rate in study year compared with previous years (t(3)=10.25. p=.002). Increase stayed significantly higher at 10 months follow-up (t(50)= -3.221, p=.002)

Kaczorowski J, Hearps SJ, Lohfield L, et al. Effect of provider and patient reminders, deployment of nurse practitioners, and financial incentives on cervical and breast cancer screening rates. Can Fam Physician. 2013;59(6):e282-9.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23766067

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Patient Reminder/Invitation, Educational Material, PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Provider Reminder/Recall Systems, Financial Incentives, Nurse/Nurse Practitioner

Intervention Results:

Significant increase in Pap smear rates between baseline and follow-up (6.3%, 95% CI: 5.1%-7.5%).

Singh MK, Einstadter D, Lawrence R. A structured women's preventive health clinic for residents: a quality improvement project designed to meet training needs and improve cervical cancer screening rates. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(5):e45.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20702435

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Other Person-to-Person Education, PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Provider Education, Designated Clinic/Extended Hours

Intervention Results:

Women who visited the clinic in period following intervention implementation 35% more likely to have a Pap test ordered (HR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.18-1.53, <.001)

Bastani R, Berman BA, Belin TR, et al. Increasing cervical cancer screening among underserved women in a large urban county health system: can it be done? What does it take? Med Care. 2002;40(10):891-907.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12395023

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Educational Material, PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Provider Education, Provider Audit/Practice Audit, Quality Improvement/Practice-Wide Intervention, Designated Clinic/Extended Hours

Intervention Results:

  • At Hospital level, increase (10.6%) from baseline to intervention years in intervention group compared with decline (-0.1%) in control group (p<.05 for difference in change scores).
  • Increase in screening rates at Comprehensive Health Center (CHC) 8.6% compared with 6.6% decline in control group (p<.05 for difference in change scores).
  • No intervention effect at the Public Health Center (PHC) level.
  • After adjusting for case-mix, significant intervention effect at Hospital (OR=3.06; 95% CI: 2.07-4.54) and CHC (OR=2.34, 95% CI: 1.05-5.23) but not at PHC level (OR=1.00. 95% CI: 0.63-1.56)

Gotay CC, Banner RO, Matsunaga DS, et al. Impact of a culturally appropriate intervention on breast and cervical screening among native Hawaiian women. Prev Med. 2000;31(5):529-37.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11071833

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Enabling Services, Educational Material, Community-Based Group Education, Designated Clinic/Extended Hours, PROVIDER/PRACTICE

Intervention Results:

Women in intervention community significantly more likely to be compliant with Pap smear guidelines than women in control community (X2=5.73. p=.02)

Nguyen TT, McPhee SJ, Gildengorin G, et al. Papanicolaou testing among Vietnamese Americans: results of a multifaceted intervention. Am J Prev Med. 2006;31(1):1-9.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16777536

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Educational Material, Community-Based Group Education, Patient Navigation, Enabling Services, PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Provider Reminder/Recall Systems, Provider Education, Designated Clinic/Extended Hours, Female Provider, COMMUNITY, Television Media, Other Media, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS

Intervention Results:

Significantly greater odds of Pap smear for women in intervention county than in control county (OR=2.02, 95% CI: 1.37-2.99)

Rosenthal MB, Frank RG, Li Z, Epstein AM. Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. JAMA. 2005;294(14):1788-93.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16219882

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Financial Incentives

Gavagan TF, Du H, Saver BG, et al. Effect of financial incentives on improvement in medical quality indicators for primary care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010;23(5):622-31.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20823357

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Financial Incentives

Perkins RB, Zisblatt L, Legler A, Trucks E, Hanchate A, Sheinfeld Gorin S. Effectiveness of a provider-focused intervention to improve HPV vaccination rates in boys and girls. Vaccine, 2015;33(9):1223-1229.

Link: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/25448095

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Provider Education, Quality Improvement/Practice-Wide Intervention, Provider Incentives (Maintenance of Certification)

Intervention Results:

  • Significantly higher rate of HPV vaccine initiation at intervention practices during the active intervention period compared to control practices (OR=1.6; 95% CI=1.1, 2.2; P<.01).
  • Significant differences not sustained during the post-intervention period.
   

This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number U02MC31613, MCH Advanced Education Policy, $3.5 M. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.