Skip Navigation

Strengthening the evidence for maternal and child health programs

Find Established Evidence


Displaying records 1 through 17 (17 total).

Byrd TL, Wilson KM, Smith JL, et al. AMIGAS: a multicity, multicomponent cervical cancer prevention trial among Mexican American women. Cancer. 2013;119(7):1365-72.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23280399

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Educational Material, Community-Based Group Education

Intervention Results:

Significant difference between intervention groups and control group (52.3% in full AMIGAS program, 45.5% in flip chart- only, 41.3% in video-only vs 24.8% in control group; p<.0001) in ITT analysis

O’Brien MJ, Halbert CH, Bixby R, Pimentel S, Shea JA. Community health worker intervention to decrease cervical cancer disparities in Hispanic women. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(11):1186-92.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20607434

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Educational Material, Community-Based Group Education

Intervention Results:

Significantly higher screening rates at 6-month follow-up for women in intervention than in control group (65% vs 36%, p=.02)

Jandorf L, Bursac Z, Pulley L, Trevino M, Castillo A, Erwin DO. Breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas attending culturally specific educational programs. Prog Community Health Partnership. 2008; 2(3):195- 204

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20208198

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Community-Based Group Education, Patient Navigation

Intervention Results:

After controlling for site and marital status, women in the intervention group had significantly increased odds of Pap smear adherence (OR=3.9, p=.0437)

Mishra SI, Luce PH, Baquet CR. Increasing pap smear utilization among Samoan women: results from a community based participatory randomized trial. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009;20(2 Suppl):85-101.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3604739/

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Community-Based Group Education

Intervention Results:

Significantly higher screening rates at 6-month follow-up for women in intervention than in control group (61.7% vs 38.3%, p=.004)

Taylor VM, Jackson JC, Yasui Y, et al. Evaluation of an outreach intervention to promote cervical cancer screening among Cambodian American women. Cancer Detect Prev. 2002;26(4):320-7.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1592335/

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Educational Material, Patient Navigation, Enabling Services, COMMUNITY, Community Events, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS, Home Visits

Intervention Results:

No significant differences in the odds of having a Pap smear between intervention and control groups

Thompson B, Coronado G, Chen L, Islas, I. Celebremos la salud! a community randomized trial of cancer prevention. Cancer Causes Control. 2006;17(5):733-46.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16633921

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Other Person-to-Person Education, Enabling Services, Other Media, Community Events, COMMUNITY, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS

Anderson JO, Mullins RM, Siahpush M, Spittal MJ, Wakefield M. Mass media campaign improves cervical screening across all socio-economic groups. Health Educ Res. 2009;24(5):867-75.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19342422

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): COMMUNITY, Television Media, Other Media, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS

Intervention Results:

Increase in Pap test rate during media campaign (27% increase; No Campaign RR=1.00 vs Campaign RR=1.27, 95% CI:1.20-1.33, p<.001)

Foley O, Birrer N, Rauh-Hain J, Clark R, DiTavi E, Carmen M. Effect of educational intervention on cervical cancer prevention and screening in Hispanic women. J Community Health. 2015;40(6):1178-84.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26026277

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Educational Material, Community-Based Group Education, Other Media, COMMUNITY, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS

Intervention Results:

No significant difference in Pap smear screening rates between baseline and follow-up

Howe A, Owen-Smith V, Richardson J. The impact of a television soap opera on the NHS Cervical Screening Programme in the North West of England. J Public Health Med. 2002;24(4):299-304.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12546207

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): COMMUNITY, Television Media, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS

Intervention Results:

21.3% increase in number of Pap smears during study period in 2001 than same time period in 2000 (95% CI: 21.0%-21.6%)

Morrell S, Perez DA, Hardy M, Cotter T, Bishop JF. Outcomes from a mass media campaign to promote cervical screening in NSW, Australia. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64(9):777-83.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19822553

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): COMMUNITY, Television Media, Other Media, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS

Intervention Results:

Significant increase in mean number of screens per week in intervention period than same period in previous year (17% difference, t-value=3.84)

Blumenthal DS, Fort JG, Ahmed NU, et al. Impact of a two-city community cancer prevention intervention on African Americans. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97(11):1479-88.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16334495

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): COMMUNITY, Other Media, Community Events, Television Media, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS

Intervention Results:

  • Significant difference in Pap smear rates between Nashville (intervention) vs Chattanooga (control; 8% effect difference, p≤.01) but not between Atlanta (intervention) vs Decatur (control)
  • Pooled results are not given

Fernandez-Esquer ME, Espinoza P, Torres I, Ramirez AG, McAlister AL. A Su Salud: a quasi-experimental study among Mexican American women. Am J Health Behav. 2003;27(5):536-45.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14521249

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Other Person-to-Person Education, Television Media, COMMUNITY, PATIENT/CONSUMER, Other Media, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS

Intervention Results:

  • Significantly higher Pap smear screening rates in intervention community among women under 40 (63% vs 39%, p<.05) in subgroup analysis
  • Results for the overall sample were not significant.

Gotay CC, Banner RO, Matsunaga DS, et al. Impact of a culturally appropriate intervention on breast and cervical screening among native Hawaiian women. Prev Med. 2000;31(5):529-37.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11071833

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Enabling Services, Educational Material, Community-Based Group Education, Designated Clinic/Extended Hours, PROVIDER/PRACTICE

Intervention Results:

Women in intervention community significantly more likely to be compliant with Pap smear guidelines than women in control community (X2=5.73. p=.02)

Luque JS, Tarasenko YN, Reyes-Garcia C, et al. Salud es Vida: a cervical cancer screening intervention for rural Latina immigrant women. [published online Jan 12, 2016]. J Canc Educ. 10.1007/s13187-015-0978-x

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4940281/

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Educational Material, Community-Based Group Education, PATIENT/CONSUMER

Intervention Results:

No significant difference in Pap smear rates between intervention and control groups

Moskowitz JM, Kazinets G, Wong JM, Tager IB. "Health is strength": a community health education program to improve breast and cervical cancer screening among Korean American Women in Alameda County, California. Cancer Detect Prev. 2007;31(2):173-83.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17418978

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Educational Material, Community-Based Group Education, Enabling Services, Other Media, COMMUNITY, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS

Intervention Results:

After adjusting for all covariates, no significant difference in Pap smear rates between intervention and comparison counties

Nguyen TT, McPhee SJ, Gildengorin G, et al. Papanicolaou testing among Vietnamese Americans: results of a multifaceted intervention. Am J Prev Med. 2006;31(1):1-9.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16777536

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Educational Material, Community-Based Group Education, Patient Navigation, Enabling Services, PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Provider Reminder/Recall Systems, Provider Education, Designated Clinic/Extended Hours, Female Provider, COMMUNITY, Television Media, Other Media, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS

Intervention Results:

Significantly greater odds of Pap smear for women in intervention county than in control county (OR=2.02, 95% CI: 1.37-2.99)

Wismer BA, Moskowitz JM, Min K, et al. Interim assessment of a community intervention to improve breast and cervical cancer screening among Korean American women. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2001;7(2):61-70.

Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12174401

NPM: 1: Well-Woman Visit
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Educational Material, Community-Based Group Education

Intervention Results:

No significant differences in Pap smear rates between the intervention and comparison counties
   

This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number U02MC31613, MCH Advanced Education Policy, $3.5 M. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.