Underwood, N. L., & Olson, N. (2019). Evaluation of Educational Interventions to Enhance Adolescent Specific Vaccination Coverage. Journal of School Health, 89(3), 212-219. [HPV Vaccination SM]
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): School-Based Family Intervention,
Intervention Description: The study "Evaluation of Educational Interventions to Enhance Adolescent Specific Vaccination Coverage" by Natasha Underwood implemented two types of educational interventions: one targeted at parents only (P only) and the other a multicomponent intervention for both parents and adolescents (P + A). The interventions aimed to increase the coverage of three vaccines recommended during adolescence: tetanus diphtheria pertussis (Tdap), meningococcal (MenACWY), and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. The specific details of the interventions were not provided in the available information. However, it can be inferred that the interventions likely included educational materials, such as brochures, pamphlets, or presentations, aimed at increasing awareness and knowledge about the importance of adolescent vaccination among the targeted audience. The multicomponent intervention for parents and adolescents may have involved tailored educational content for each group, as well as strategies to facilitate communication and decision-making regarding vaccination within families. For more detailed information on the specific content and delivery of the interventions, referring to the original study by Natasha Underwood would be necessary.
Intervention Results: The study "Evaluation of Educational Interventions to Enhance Adolescent Specific Vaccination Coverage" by Natasha Underwood found that both the parent-only (P only) and multicomponent parent and adolescent (P + A) interventions were effective in increasing vaccination coverage among middle and high school students in Georgia. The study found that the P only intervention resulted in a statistically significant increase in Tdap vaccination coverage among students, from 85.5% at baseline to 91.5% at follow-up. The P + A intervention resulted in a statistically significant increase in Tdap and MenACWY vaccination coverage among students, from 85.5% to 92.5% and from 85.5% to 91.5%, respectively. The study also found that the P + A intervention was more effective than the P only intervention in increasing HPV vaccination coverage among students. The P + A intervention resulted in a statistically significant increase in HPV vaccination coverage among students, from 47.5% to 57.5%, while the P only intervention did not result in a statistically significant increase. Overall, the study suggests that educational interventions targeting parents and adolescents can be effective in increasing adolescent vaccination coverage.
Conclusion: The study "Evaluation of Educational Interventions to Enhance Adolescent Specific Vaccination Coverage" by Natasha Underwood concluded that both the parent-only (P only) and multicomponent parent and adolescent (P + A) educational interventions were effective in increasing vaccination coverage among middle and high school students in Georgia. The findings suggest that targeted educational interventions can positively impact adolescent vaccination rates, particularly for vaccines such as Tdap, MenACWY, and HPV. The study's results support the importance of implementing educational interventions that involve both parents and adolescents to enhance vaccination coverage. The multicomponent approach, which included both parents and adolescents, demonstrated greater effectiveness in increasing vaccination coverage compared to the parent-only intervention for certain vaccines. These conclusions highlight the potential of educational interventions to address vaccination disparities and improve overall vaccination rates among adolescents, emphasizing the significance of engaging both parents and adolescents in vaccination promotion efforts.
Study Design: The study "Evaluation of Educational Interventions to Enhance Adolescent Specific Vaccination Coverage" by Natasha Underwood used a randomized controlled trial design. The 11 middle and high schools in Georgia were randomized into three arms: control, educational intervention for parents only (P only), and multicomponent educational intervention for parents and adolescents (P + A). The study assessed the impact of these interventions on increasing the coverage of three vaccines recommended during adolescence among middle and high school students in the specific setting. The study collected data through surveys administered to students and parents at baseline and follow-up.
Setting: The setting for the study "Evaluation of Educational Interventions to Enhance Adolescent Specific Vaccination Coverage" by Natasha Underwood was conducted in 11 middle and high schools within one school district in Georgia. The study focused on assessing the impact of educational interventions on increasing the coverage of three vaccines recommended during adolescence among middle and high school students in this specific setting.
Population of Focus: The target audience for the study "Evaluation of Educational Interventions to Enhance Adolescent Specific Vaccination Coverage" by Natasha Underwood was middle and high school students in Georgia, specifically those who were recommended to receive three vaccines during adolescence: tetanus diphtheria pertussis (Tdap), meningococcal (MenACWY), and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. The study also targeted parents of these students, as one of the interventions was designed specifically for parents.
Sample Size: The study "Evaluation of Educational Interventions to Enhance Adolescent Specific Vaccination Coverage" by Natasha Underwood had a sample size of 11 middle and high schools in Georgia. The schools were randomized into three arms: control, educational intervention for parents only (P only), and multicomponent educational intervention for parents and adolescents (P + A). The study did not provide information on the number of students or parents included in the sample.
Age Range: The study "Evaluation of Educational Interventions to Enhance Adolescent Specific Vaccination Coverage" by Natasha Underwood focused on middle and high school students in Georgia, who are typically between the ages of 11-18 years old. The study targeted students who were recommended to receive three vaccines during adolescence: tetanus diphtheria pertussis (Tdap), meningococcal (MenACWY), and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. Therefore, the age range of the participants in the study was likely between 11-18 years old.
Access Abstract