Jahn, J.L., Simes, J.T. Prenatal healthcare after sentencing reform: heterogeneous effects for prenatal healthcare access and equity. BMC Public Health 22, 954 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13359-7
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Policy/Guideline (State)
Prenatal Care Access
Targeting Interventions to Focused Groups
Intervention Description: The intervention in this study was Pennsylvania's criminal sentencing reform policy, which aimed to reduce the state's prison population by implementing revised sentencing guidelines and increasing investments in community-based services. The policy was implemented in 2012 and was expected to reduce the number of people admitted to state prisons in Pennsylvania. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of this policy on early and adequate prenatal care utilization among birthing people in Pennsylvania, with a focus on effect heterogeneity across birthing person race/ethnicity and educational attainment. The study found that the benefits of the policy for prenatal care were largely limited to counties where prison admission rates declined the most after the policy, and improvements were primarily observed among groups that are more likely to be affected by prison admissions, Black birthing people and those with lower levels of education
Intervention Results: The study found that in counties where prison admissions declined the most after the policy, early prenatal care increased from 69.0% to 73.2%, and inadequate prenatal care decreased from 18.1% to 15.9%. By comparison, improvements in early prenatal care were smaller in counties where prison admissions increased the most post-policy (73.5 to 76.4%) and there was no change to prenatal care inadequacy (14.4% pre and post). The study found this pattern of improvements to be particularly strong among Black birthing people and those with lower levels of educational attainment. The study concluded that Pennsylvania's sentencing reforms were associated with small advancements in racial and socioeconomic equity in prenatal care. However, the study also noted that incremental changes to criminal justice policy are unlikely to have broad effects for health equity, and transformative policy changes in the areas of healthcare, social welfare, and criminal justice together will be necessary to see dramatic shifts in preventative healthcare inequities.
Conclusion: The study concluded that Pennsylvania's criminal sentencing reform policy was associated with small advancements in racial and socioeconomic equity in prenatal care utilization. The study found that the benefits of the policy for prenatal care were largely limited to counties where prison admission rates declined the most after the policy, and improvements were primarily observed among groups that are more likely to be affected by prison admissions, Black birthing people and those with lower levels of education. The study also noted that incremental changes to criminal justice policy are unlikely to have broad effects for health equity, and transformative policy changes in the areas of healthcare, social welfare, and criminal justice together will be necessary to see dramatic shifts in preventative healthcare inequities. The study highlights the importance of contextual conditions of incarceration for preventative healthcare access and utilization and sheds light on how criminal justice reforms may have spillover effects for healthcare utilization and health equity.
Study Design: The study design was an interrupted time series analysis using individual-level birth certificate data linked to county-level rates of prison admissions in Pennsylvania from 2009 to 2015. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of Pennsylvania's criminal sentencing reform policy on early and adequate prenatal care utilization, with a focus on effect heterogeneity across birthing person race/ethnicity and educational attainment. The study used Poisson regression models with robust error variance to estimate changes in prenatal care utilization after the policy, stratified by quartiles of county-level pre-post difference in mean monthly prison admission rates. The study design allowed for the assessment of changes in prenatal care utilization over time, before and after the policy, and across different subgroups of the population.
Setting: The setting for this study is Pennsylvania, focusing on the period from 2009 to 2015. The researchers linked individual-level birth certificate data to monthly county-level rates of prison admissions in Pennsylvania during this time frame. By examining the effects of Pennsylvania's criminal sentencing reform on prenatal healthcare access and equity, the study provides valuable insights into the impact of policy changes on healthcare utilization in the context of the criminal justice system
Population of Focus: The target audience for this study is likely researchers, policymakers, and healthcare professionals interested in understanding the impact of criminal justice policies on healthcare access and equity, particularly in the context of prenatal care. The study provides important insights into the potential benefits of reducing incarceration rates for improving early and adequate prenatal care, particularly for marginalized communities. The findings may be of interest to those working in public health, criminal justice reform, and healthcare policy.
Sample Size: Thestudy used individual-level birth certificate microdata on births in Pennsylvania from 2009 to 2015, totaling 999,503 births. This large sample size allowed the researchers to assess the effects of Pennsylvania's criminal sentencing reform on prenatal healthcare access and equity across a significant number of births in the state. The substantial sample size contributes to the robustness of the study's findings.
Age Range: The study did not report a specific age range for the birthing people included in the sample. However, the study did collect data on self-reported age (< 19, 20–29, 30–39, 40 + years) as an individual-level covariate in their statistical analysis. Therefore, the study likely included birthing people across a range of ages, from under 19 to over 40 years old.
Access Abstract