Skip Navigation

Strengthen the Evidence for Maternal and Child Health Programs

Sign up for MCHalert eNewsletter

Established Evidence Results

Results for Keyword:

Below are articles that support specific interventions to advance MCH National Performance Measures (NPMs) and Standardized Measures (SMs). Most interventions contain multiple components as part of a coordinated strategy/approach.

You can filter by intervention component below and sort to refine your search.

Start a New Search


Displaying records 1 through 4 (4 total).

Battarbee, A. N., Sandoval, G., Grobman, W. A., Reddy, U. M., Tita, A., Silver, R. M., El-Sayed, Y. Y., Wapner, R. J., Rouse, D. J., Saade, G. R., Chauhan, S. P., Iams, J. D., Chien, E. K., Casey, B. M., Gibbs, R. S., Srinivas, S. K., Swamy, G. K., Simhan, H. N., & Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network (2021). Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Associated with Amniotomy among Nulliparous Women Undergoing Labor Induction at Term. American journal of perinatology, 38(S 01), e239–e248. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709464

Evidence Rating: Emerging

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE, Active Management of Labor, Prolonged Second Stage of Labor

Intervention Description: RCT. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared among women with amniotomy versus women with intact membranes and no amniotomy at 6 2-hour time intervals: before oxytocin initiation, 0 to <2 hours after oxytocin, 2 to <4 hours after, 4 to <6 hours after, 6 to <8 hours after, and 8 to <10 hours after

Intervention Results: Of 6,106 women in the parent trial, 2,854 (46.7%) women met inclusion criteria. Of these 2,340 (82.0%) underwent amniotomy, and majority of the women had amniotomy performed between 2 and <6 hours after oxytocin. Cesarean delivery was less frequent among women with amniotomy 6 to <8 hours after oxytocin compared with women without amniotomy (21.9 vs. 29.7%; adjusted odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.42-0.89). Amniotomy at time intervals ≥4 hours after oxytocin was associated with lower odds of labor duration >24 hours. Amniotomy at time intervals ≥2 hours and <8 hours after oxytocin was associated with lower odds of maternal hospitalization >3 days. Amniotomy was not associated with postpartum or neonatal complications.

Conclusion: Among a contemporary cohort of nulliparous women undergoing term labor induction, amniotomy was associated with either lower or similar odds of cesarean delivery and other adverse outcomes, compared with no amniotomy.

Setting: Hospitals

Population of Focus: Nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor with oxytocin at or after 38 weeks' pregnancy.

Access Abstract

Garpiel S. J. (2018). Effects of an Interdisciplinary Practice Bundle for Second-Stage Labor on Clinical Outcomes. MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursing, 43(4), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0000000000000438

Evidence Rating: Emerging

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE, Prolonged Second Stage of Labor, HOSPITAL, Guideline Change and Implementation, Quality Improvement, Collaboratives, Policy/Guideline (Hospital)

Intervention Description: Standardized second-stage labor evidence-based practice recommendations were structured into an interdisciplinary “5 Ps practice bundle” (patience, positioning, physiologic resuscitation, progress, preventing urinary harm) and implemented across 34 birthing hospitals. The second-stage labor practices were derived from the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses and the American College of Nurse-Midwives professional guidelines. The recommendations are designed to support the laboring woman's normal physiologic processes and avoid unnecessary interventions.

Intervention Results: Significant improvements were observed in second-stage practices. Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses' perinatal nursing care quality measure Second-Stage of Labor: Mother-Initiated Spontaneous Pushing significantly improved [pre-implementation 43% (510/1,195), post-implementation 76% (1,541/2,028), p < .0001]. Joint Commission Perinatal Care-02: nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean rate significantly decreased (p = 0.02) with no differences in maternal morbidity, or negative newborn birth outcomes. Unexpected complications in term births significantly decreased in all newborns (p < 0.001), and for newborns from vaginal births (p = 0.03). Birth experience satisfaction rose from the 69th to the 81st percentile.

Conclusion: Clinical implications: Implementing 13 evidence-based second-stage labor practices derived from the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses and the American College of Nurse-Midwives professional guidelines achieved our goals of safely reducing primary cesarean birth among low-risk nulliparous women, and optimizing maternal and fetal outcomes associated with labor and birth. By minimizing routine interventions, nurses support physiologic birth and improve women's birth satisfaction.

Setting: 34 birthing hospitals in the Trinity Health System

Population of Focus: Nulliparous women with term singleton vertex gestations

Access Abstract

Gimovsky AC, Berghella V. Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(3):361.e1-6.

Evidence Rating: Moderate Evidence

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Prolonged Second Stage of Labor

Intervention Description: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether extending the length of labor in nulliparous women with prolonged second stage affects the incidence of cesarean delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Intervention Results: The incidence of cesarean delivery was 19.5% (n = 8/41 deliveries) in the extended labor group and 43.2% (n = 16/37 deliveries) in the usual labor group (relative risk, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.93). The number needed-to-treat to prevent 1 cesarean delivery was 4.2. There were no statistically significant differences in maternal or neonatal morbidity outcomes.

Conclusion: Extending the length of labor in nulliparous women with singleton gestations, epidural anesthesia, and prolonged second stage decreased the incidence of cesarean delivery by slightly more than one-half, compared with usual guidelines. Maternal or neonatal morbidity were not statistically different between the groups; however, our study was underpowered to detect small, but potentially clinical important, differences.

Study Design: RCT

Setting: 1 women’s hospital

Population of Focus: Nulliparous women who gave birth between March 2004 and July 2015

Data Source: Not specified

Sample Size: Total (n=78) Intervention (n=41) Control (n=37)

Age Range: Not Specified

Access Abstract

Ragusa, A., Gizzo, S., Noventa, M., Ferrazzi, E., Deiana, S., & Svelato, A. (2016). Prevention of primary caesarean delivery: comprehensive management of dystocia in nulliparous patients at term. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 294(4), 753–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4046-5

Evidence Rating: Emerging

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE, Active Management of Labor, Labor Support, Midwifery, Prolonged Second Stage of Labor, HOSPITAL, Chart Audit and Feedback, Guideline Change and Implementation

Intervention Description: 419 consecutive patients were divided into two groups, with one group (216 patients) receiving “standard management” (with medical acceleration of labor commencing at the ‘‘action line’’ in the case of arrested or protracted labor) and the other group (203 patients) receiving “comprehensive management” (CM) where arrested or protracted labor was considered a warning sign promoting further diagnostic assessment prior to considering intervention. Comprehensive management included the daily audit and discussion of clinical cases by medical and midwifery staff; the introduction of intrapartum ultrasonography alongside traditional clinical assessment to determine fetal head and trunk position accurately; one-on-one labor support facilitated by midwives and/or labor partners; and attention to the psychological well-being of the patient throughout labor and delivery.

Intervention Results: his study included 3283 and 3068 women in the before and after periods, respectively. The groups had similar general and obstetric characteristics. The global cesarean delivery rate decreased significantly from 9.4% in the preguideline to 6.9% in the postguideline period (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.85; P < .01). The cesarean delivery rate for arrest of first-stage labor fell by half, from 1.8% to 0.9% (odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.81; P < .01) but was significant only among nulliparous women. The cesarean delivery rate for second-stage arrest of labor decreased but not significantly between periods (1.3% vs 1.0%; odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-1.22; P = .2), and the cesarean delivery rate for failure of induction remained similar (3.7% vs 3.5%; odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-13.24; P = .88). The median duration of labor before cesarean delivery also became significantly longer among nulliparous women during the later period. Maternal and neonatal outcomes did not differ between the 2 periods, except that the rate of 1 minute Apgar score <7 fell significantly in the later period (8.4% vs 6.9%; odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.97; P = .02).

Conclusion: The modification of our protocol by implementing the new consensus recommendations was associated with a reduction of the rate of primary cesarean delivery performed for arrest of labor with no apparent increase in immediate adverse neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women at term with singleton pregnancies in vertex presentation and with epidural anesthesia. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term maternal and neonatal safety of these policies.

Setting: Obstetric Unit of Sesto San Giovanni Hospital, Milan, Italy, an urban community hospital

Population of Focus: nulliparous women with a single fetus in cephalic presentation, in spontaneous labor at term or induced labor post term.

Access Abstract

The MCH Digital Library is one of six special collections at Geogetown University, the nation's oldest Jesuit institution of higher education. It is supported in part by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under award number U02MC31613, MCH Advanced Education Policy with an award of $700,000/year. The library is also supported through foundation and univerity funding. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.