Classen, S., Szeszulski, J., Ranjit, N., Rivas-Ponce, G., & Hoelscher, D. M. (2022). Coordinated Health in Texas Elementary Schools’ Campus Improvement Plans: Analysis of Regional Differences and Trends between 2016 and 2020. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(9), 4979.
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): CLASSROOM_SCHOOL, Multicomponent School-Based Program, COMMUNITY, Policy (Community)
Intervention Description: Schools signal health priorities through policies. School districts prioritize health and, accordingly, their school health environments through policies that engage parents/guardians, campus educators, staff, and community leaders in the development process. Using a repeated cross-sectional study design, we compare the presence and strength of policies related to four topics—physical activity, nutrition, mental health, and bullying—described in elementary school Campus Improvement Plans (CIPs; also called school improvement plans) within Texas, across four Texas Public Health Regions (PHRs), and between 2016 and 2020. CIPs were collected using a multi-stage probability-based survey approach, scored using an adapted WellSAT tool, and analyzed to determine associations between PHR or year and health topic.
Intervention Results: Across 170 CIPs, bullying was the most frequently addressed topic, followed by mental health, physical activity, and nutrition. On average, schools addressed 2.7 ± 1.3 topics within their CIP; 38.2% of schools addressed all four, 26.5% addressed three, 12.4% addressed two, 15.3% addressed one, and 7.6% addressed none. CIPs in the same district had high levels of clustering (ICCs = 0.28–0.55). The mostly rural Panhandle PHR included the fewest topics in their CIPs and used the weakest policy language.
Conclusion: Between 2016 and 2020, there was a decrease in the proportion of CIPs that addressed nutrition; the strength of language for mental health and bullying also decreased. Regional and time trends reveal opportunities for more robust school health policy interventions.
Study Design: Repeated cross-sectional study
Setting: Elementary Schools in Texas across Texas Public Health Regions
Population of Focus: Elementary aged children, Grades K-5, attending participating schools with Campus Improvement Plans
Sample Size: 170 Campus Improvement Plans/Elementary schools
Age Range: Children ages 5-11 years
Access Abstract