Butler Tobah YS, LeBlanc A, Branda ME, Inselman JW, Morris MA, Ridgeway JL, Finnie DM, Theiler R, Torbenson VE, Brodrick EM, Meylor de Mooij M, Gostout B, Famuyide A. Randomized comparison of a reduced-visit prenatal care model enhanced with remote monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):638.e1-638.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.034. Epub 2019 Jun 19. PMID: 31228414.
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Organizational Changes, Prenatal Care Access, Access, Telehealth/Virtual Care
Intervention Description: The OB Nest intervention involved a reduced-frequency prenatal care model enhanced with remote home monitoring devices and nursing support. Participants in the OB Nest group received 8 scheduled clinic appointments with an obstetrician or a certified nurse midwife, as well as 6 virtual (phone or online) connected care visits with an OB Nest registered nurse. These virtual visits consisted of home blood pressure and fetal heart rate evaluation. Additionally, the OB Nest model included home monitoring devices and an online prenatal community to support the pregnant women .
Intervention Results:
The study found that participants in the OB Nest group had significantly higher satisfaction with care and lower prenatal-related stress compared to patients in the usual care group. Perceived quality of care was similar between groups. Adherence to the provision of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists prenatal services was similar in both arms. Maternal and fetal clinical outcomes were similar between groups. Total reported nursing time was higher in OB Nest. The study concluded that OB Nest is an innovative, acceptable, and effective reduced-frequency prenatal care model that resulted in higher patient satisfaction and lower prenatal stress while reducing the number of appointments with clinicians and maintaining care standards for pregnant women .
Conclusion: The study concluded that the OB Nest intervention is an innovative, acceptable, and effective reduced-frequency prenatal care model. It resulted in higher patient satisfaction and lower prenatal stress, while reducing the number of appointments with clinicians and maintaining care standards for pregnant women. The findings suggest that OB Nest is a step toward evidence-driven prenatal care that improves patient satisfaction .
Study Design: The study utilized a rigorous randomized controlled trial (RCT) design to compare the OB Nest prenatal care model with usual care. Participants were randomized to either OB Nest or usual care using a dynamic allocation system, with an algorithm minimizing imbalances in a 1:1 ratio across specific factors such as age, body mass index, and parity. The allocation sequence was concealed from the study nurse who enrolled and assessed the eligibility of participants. The study team nurses and clinicians were aware of the assigned arms after randomization occurred, and team members analyzing quantitative data were blinded to which intervention arm mothers were assigned to
Setting: The study was conducted as a single-center randomized controlled trial within the Outpatient Obstetric Division at Mayo Clinic, a tertiary care academic center in Rochester, Minnesota. The Mayo Clinic serves approximately 2400 pregnant women annually, and the trial took place between March 2014 and January 2015
Population of Focus: The target audience for the OB Nest prenatal care model and the study evaluating its effectiveness were low-risk pregnant women who were between 18 and 36 years old, at less than 13 weeks of gestation, and without a concurrent medical or obstetric complication, who had the ability to provide informed consent. The study aimed to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of the OB Nest model compared to traditional prenatal care for this specific population .
Sample Size: he study aimed to recruit 300 pregnant women, with 150 participants assigned to the OB Nest group and 150 participants assigned to the usual care group. The sample size was determined based on the power to detect differences in patient satisfaction, which was considered the most important endpoint for pregnant patients and caregiver representatives when creating the OB Nest bundle. The study was powered to detect differences in patient satisfaction with a 98% power to detect a difference of 7 points, based on a standard deviation of 14.4, with 10% attrition
Age Range: The study enrolled English-speaking pregnant women between 18 and 36 years old who were at less than 13 weeks of gestation. This age range was part of the enrollment criteria for the study .
Access Abstract