Baker MV, Butler-Tobah YS, Famuyide AO, Theiler RN. Medicaid Cost and Reimbursement for Low-Risk Prenatal Care in the United States. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2021 Sep;66(5):589-596. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13271. Epub 2021 Oct 1. PMID: 34596945.
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Prenatal Care Access, Medicaid,
Intervention Description: The study proposed several intervention features based on participant ideas for change. These intervention features were intended to address the unique unmet needs and preferences of pregnant women with varying degrees of unscheduled care utilization. The proposed intervention features included:
1. Social Support:
- Integration of community health workers (CHWs) into care teams and existing childbirth education.
- Connecting pregnant individuals with social services resources.
- Group prenatal care support.
2. Care Delivery:
- Health information exchange.
- Prenatal passport cards or applications.
- Visit checklists.
- Integration of technology already in use.
3. Access:
- Advanced access scheduling.
- Enhanced care team visibility.
- Drop-in pregnancy support center.
- Insurance screening and enrollment.
- Integration of CHW support for navigation and continuity.
These intervention features were intended to address the participants' expressed needs for social support, improved care delivery, and enhanced access to outpatient prenatal care. The study aimed to leverage these person-centered intervention elements to improve trust and impact of prenatal care, with the potential to advance equitably improved outcomes
Intervention Results: he study identified three overarching thematic domains from participant ideas for improving prenatal care: social support, improved care delivery, and improved access to outpatient prenatal care. The study found that pregnant women with frequent unscheduled care utilization had unique unmet needs compared to those with no prior unscheduled visits. Participants in Group 1 overwhelmingly wanted to feel heard and centered by providers, while those in Group 2 expressed ambivalence about increased social support. The study proposed several intervention features based on participant ideas for change, including integration of CHWs into care teams, group prenatal care support, and advanced access scheduling. The study concluded that these person-centered intervention elements could improve trust and impact of prenatal care, with the potential to advance equitably improved outcomes
Conclusion: The study concluded that low-income, Medicaid-insured, predominantly Black pregnant women face unique unmet needs in prenatal care delivery, which can be addressed through person-centered intervention elements. The study proposed several intervention features based on participant ideas for change, including integration of CHWs into care teams, group prenatal care support, and advanced access scheduling. These intervention features were intended to address the participants' expressed needs for social support, improved care delivery, and enhanced access to outpatient prenatal care. The study aimed to leverage these person-centered intervention elements to improve trust and impact of prenatal care, with the potential to advance equitably improved outcomes. The study highlights the importance of engaging pregnant women in the design of interventions to improve prenatal care delivery and reduce disparities in maternal and infant health outcomes
Study Design: The study design was a qualitative, participatory action research approach. The researchers conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with pregnant women at the point of unscheduled hospital-based obstetric care in a triage unit. The interviews were designed to explore the participants' perspectives on group prenatal care, community health worker (CHW) interventions, and ideas for improving care. The study team then used grounded theory to develop a coding structure and identify major themes that emerged from the data, relating to participant ideas for improving care. The resulting intervention framework was presented to all study team members for validation, adjustment, and finalization.
Setting: The setting for this study was focused on low-SES, Medicaid-insured, predominantly Black pregnant women. The study aimed to understand the experiences and perspectives of pregnant individuals who are frequent and infrequent users of unscheduled care in the emergency room and obstetric triage. The insights and recommendations provided in the study are based on the narratives and experiences of these specific groups of pregnant individuals, highlighting the importance of tailoring prenatal care delivery to meet the unique needs of this population.
Population of Focus: The target audience for this study was low-income, Medicaid-insured, predominantly Black pregnant women with varying degrees of unscheduled care utilization. The study aimed to understand the perspectives and experiences of this specific demographic group in order to identify unmet needs and propose interventions to improve prenatal care delivery tailored to their unique requirements. The findings and recommendations presented in the study are intended to inform healthcare providers, policymakers, and organizations involved in prenatal care for this target audience, with the goal of enhancing access to early prenatal care and improving perinatal outcomes.
Sample Size: he sample size for this study was 40 participants, who were enrolled and categorized as either Group 1 (n = 20) or Group 2 (n = 20). The participants were low-income, Medicaid-insured, predominantly Black pregnant women with varying degrees of unscheduled care utilization. The study team conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with these participants to explore their perspectives on barriers and facilitators of health and ideas for improvement in care delivery, with a focus on the potential role of community health workers and social support. The study team then used modified grounded theory to develop general and subset themes by study group and mapped these themes to potential intervention features.
Age Range: The study did not provide a specific age range for the participants. However, it did report that the mean age for Group 1 was 25.5 years and for Group 2 was 25.0 years. The study also reported that all enrolled participants self-identified as cis-gender women and were predominantly Black (95%).
Access Abstract