Danchin M. Does informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination improve uptake? J Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Sep;55(9):1142-1144. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14574. PMID: 31524974. [Childhood Vaccination NPM]
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Parent Engagement, Educational Material,
Intervention Description: The interventions in the reviewed trials involved face-to-face communication aimed at providing information or education to parents or expectant parents about childhood vaccination. The content of the interventions focused on increasing children’s vaccination status, knowledge, understanding of vaccination, attitudes, and intention to vaccinate. The interventions varied in length, with some being single-session discussions and others being multi-session interventions. Additionally, the majority of the interventions focused on immunization alone, while some also included information about other child health topics such as breastfeeding ,[object Object],.
Intervention Results: The results of the reviewed trials suggest that face-to-face information or education delivered to parents or expectant parents may improve children’s vaccination status, parents’ knowledge or understanding of vaccination, and parents’ intention to vaccinate. However, the certainty of the evidence was low for all outcomes except for parents’ knowledge or understanding, which had a moderate certainty of evidence. The interventions may lead to little or no difference in parental attitudes or anxiety related to the intervention ,[object Object],.
Conclusion: Information or education about childhood vaccination delivered through face-to-face communication may improve vaccination coverage and parents' knowledge. This practice is likely already taking place in the majority of clinical encounters related to childhood vaccination, and supports the key role of the health-care provider in communicating about vaccines with parents.
Study Design: The reviewed trials used various study designs, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental designs. The interventions were delivered in a face-to-face format to parents or expectant parents, and the control groups received neither education, printed materials, general routine vaccination information, nor an educational video covering the same topic as the face-to-face intervention ,[object Object],. The authors of the review excluded multi-component interventions, where the impact of the face-to-face communication elements could not be isolated ,[object Object],.
Setting: The review included trials conducted in various settings, including both high-income countries and low- or middle-income countries such as Nepal and Pakistan ,[object Object],. Additionally, the interventions were delivered in different settings, including individual sessions and group sessions ,[object Object],. This diversity in settings provides a broad perspective on the effects of face-to-face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination.
Population of Focus: The target audience for the face-to-face interventions in the reviewed trials was parents or expectant parents. The interventions aimed to provide information or education to this specific audience to increase children’s vaccination status, knowledge, understanding of vaccination, attitudes, and intention to vaccinate ,[object Object],.
Sample Size: The sample sizes in the reviewed trials varied, with half of the studies involving 100–250 participants and the other half involving more than 400 participants. Additionally, three trials were conducted in low- or middle-income countries, and two trials delivered the intervention to a group, while the rest were delivered to individuals ,[object Object],. This variation in sample sizes and settings provides a diverse perspective on the effects of face-to-face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination.
Age Range: The reviewed trials focused on interventions aimed at parents or expectant parents to increase children’s vaccination status. Therefore, the age range of the target audience was not explicitly mentioned in the information provided in the document. However, it can be inferred that the interventions were targeted at parents or expectant parents of young children who would be receiving vaccinations according to the childhood immunization schedule.
Access Abstract