Gidaszewski, B., Khajehei, M., Gibbs, E., & Chua, S. C. (2019). Comparison of the effect of caseload midwifery program and standard midwifery-led care on primiparous birth outcomes: A retrospective cohort matching study. Midwifery, 69, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.10.010
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE, Continuity of Care (Caseload), Midwifery
Intervention Description: This retrospective cohort study compared the cesarean section rate of nulliparous women who received standard midwifery care and those who opted to participate in a caseload midwifery program (CMP) where they would see the same midwife throughout their term. This midwife would remain the “lead,” even if the patient was referred to a physician due to complications. The data was extracted from the records of 19,001 women who gave birth at the hospital from 2011 to 2014. The final study cohort included only nulliparous women and combined the total population of nulliparous women who received care from the CMP (n = 500) and the comparison group that was selected by matching for parity, country of birth, age and body mass index (BMI) on a 1:1 basis.
Intervention Results: Adjusted regression analysis for the primary outcome showed that compared with women who received SMC, women who received care through CMP had an increased rate of normal vaginal birth (69% vs. 50%, OR = 1.79, 95%, CI = 1.38-2.32). Assessment of secondary outcomes showed that the women in CMP group had decreased rates of instrumental birth (15% vs. 26%, OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.35-0.66), episiotomy (23% vs. 40%, OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.33-0.57), epidural analgesia (33% vs. 43%, OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.50-0.83) and amniotomy (35% vs. 50%, OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.43-0.72). The CMP group also had greater rates of water immersion (54% vs. 22%, OR = 4.18, 95% CI = 3.17-5.5), physiological 3rd stage (7% vs. 1%, OR = 11.71, 95% CI = 3.56-38.43) and 2nd degree tear (34% vs. 24%, OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.21-2.11). There were no significant differences between the two groups for rates of other secondary outcomes including Caesarean section, cervical ripening procedures, third- and fourth-degree tears, postpartum haemorrhage and neonatal outcomes.
Conclusion: CMP care is associated with increased rate of normal vaginal birth which supports wider implementation of the model. In addition, using routinely collected data and a cohort matching design can be an effective approach to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Setting: Metropolitan tertiary hospital in Australia
Population of Focus: Nulliparous women
Access Abstract