Established Evidence Results

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): YOUTH, Adult-led Support/Counseling/Remediation, PARENT/FAMILY, CAREGIVER, Educational Material (caregiver), Motivational Interviewing/Counseling, Consultation/Counseling (Parent/Family), Counseling (Parent/Family)

Intervention Description: To determine whether repeated infancy-onset lifestyle counselling alters parental smoking and children's exposure to tobacco smoke.

Intervention Results: Parents' smoking decreased during the study similarly in the intervention and control groups. Of the 8-y-old children, 46% had detectable serum cotinine concentration, suggesting exposure to tobacco smoke during the past few days. All children were non-smokers. Serum cotinine concentrations did not differ between the intervention and control children. Children's cotinine values were highest in the families where either father or both parents were smokers.

Conclusion: Participation in the atherosclerosis prevention trial slightly decreased smoking among the intervention and control parents. However, counselling led to no differences in parental smoking between the two groups, or in exposure of the intervention and control children to tobacco smoke. This study suggests that more detailed and targeted intervention is required to achieve a significant effect on children's tobacco smoke exposure.

Study Design: Randomized prospective intervention trial

Setting: Pediatric well-child visits

Population of Focus: Families presenting at a well-baby clinic with a child 5 months old.

Data Source: Cotinine measurements of mothers, fathers, and children; Reported smoking of parents during annual office visit to pediatrician (via questionnaires and interviews)

Sample Size: 1062 families (Intervention= 540; Control = 522)

Age Range: Not specified

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Educational Material, Peer Counselor, Telephone Support, Other Education, Motivational Interviewing, CAREGIVER, Education/Training (caregiver), Educational Material (caregiver), Motivational Interviewing/Counseling, PARENT/FAMILY, Notification/Information Materials (Online Resources, Information Guide), Consultation/Counseling (Parent/Family), Counseling (Parent/Family)

Intervention Description: We hypothesized that a multilevel treatment model integrating pediatric clinic-level AAR with individual-level, telephone counseling would promote greater long-term (12-month) child TSE reduction and parent smoking cessation than clinic-level AAR alone.

Intervention Results: Child TSE (urine cotinine) declined significantly in both intervention and control groups from baseline to 12-months with no between-group differences. There was s statistically significant effect on 12-month bioverified quit status-intervention group participants were 2.47 times more likely to quit smoking than those in the control group.

Conclusion: Pediatrician advice alone may be sufficient to increase parent protections of children from TSE. Integrating clinic-level intervention with more intensive individual-level smoking intervention is necessary to promote parent cessation.

Study Design: RCT

Setting: Telephone counseling

Population of Focus: Parents/caregivers

Data Source: Self-reported interview data

Sample Size: 327 were randomized (164-control and 163-intervention)

Age Range: Not specified

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): CAREGIVER, Motivational Interviewing/Counseling, PARENT/FAMILY, Notification/Information Materials (Online Resources, Information Guide), Consultation/Counseling (Parent/Family), Counseling (Parent/Family), Educational Material (caregiver)

Intervention Description: Children with asthma who are exposed to environmental tobacco smoke are at increased risk for adverse health consequences. An experimental design was used to evaluate a minimal-contact intervention aimed at modifying parents' smoking behavior in their homes.

Intervention Results: More treatment (35%) than control (17%) subjects reported smoking outside their homes at posttest (and their children’s cotinine levels were lower), but this difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: difference was not statistically significant.

Study Design: Experimental design

Setting: Pediatric pulmonary clinics in U of MI

Population of Focus: Parents of children with asthma

Data Source: Parent questionnaire on smoking status and child urine sample.

Sample Size: 92 families randomly assigned

Age Range: Not specified