Park, E., & Jang, B. G. (2018). Youth Substance Use Prevention Using Disciplinary Literacy Strategies: A Pilot Study. Journal of addictions nursing, 29(4), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1097/JAN.0000000000000253
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Education on Disease/Condition, Community Events,
Intervention Description: The purpose of this study was to develop and implement a community-based program aiming for smoking, alcohol, and substance use prevention based on multiple disciplinary literacy strategies. A one-group pretest-and-posttest comparison design was used to test the feasibility of the new substance use prevention program. Thirty-two adolescents, most from families with minority and low-socioeconomic status backgrounds, participated. The group met for a 1-hour session once a week for 10 weeks. The program was implemented in a suburban setting in a southeastern state in the United States.
Intervention Results: The results of the study indicated that the community-based youth substance use prevention program using disciplinary literacy strategies was well-received by the participants, with high levels of satisfaction reported. Significant positive changes were observed in participants' knowledge, skills, assets related to substance use, intention not to smoke, perception of the unhealthiness of tobacco, perceived benefits of remaining tobacco-free, and attitudes toward smoking.
Conclusion: The study found that the community-based youth substance use prevention program was effective in improving participants' knowledge, skills, assets related to substance use, intention not to smoke, perception of the unhealthiness of tobacco, perceived benefits of remaining tobacco-free, and attitudes toward smoking.
Study Design: Pre/post intervention design
Setting: Suburban community in a southeastern USA state
Population of Focus: Practitioners of community-based youth substance prevention programs
Sample Size: 32 adolescents
Age Range: No age range given, only that "adolescents" were study participants
Access Abstract