Established Evidence Results

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PAYER, Expanded Insurance Coverage, HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE, Public Insurance (Health Care Provider/Practice), Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Collaboration with Local Agencies (Health Care Provider/Practice), CLASSROOM_SCHOOL, PROFESSIONAL_CAREGIVER, Outreach (caregiver), Communication Tools, Distribution of Promotional Items (Classroom/School)

Intervention Description: In Michigan, a school-based outreach effort was piloted using existing school communication tools to identify children who are currently uninsured and may be eligible for state-subsidized health insurance. School districts were provided with two health insurance status collection forms to be included with the free and reduced school lunch application, and as part of the student registration packet and welcome materials for school. Completed forms were sent to a state registered application-assisting agency to ensure families can access the coverage and services they need. A final step in the process is outreach to eligible respondents by the Michigan Primary Care Association to help ensure that they receive information and access to the healthcare coverage and services they need.

Intervention Results: As a result of the survey, 156 children were identified as not having health insurance. This represents more than 44% of the 358 children who are eligible for State subsidized health insurance, in the participating school districts, but are uninsured. Integrating the collection of health insurance status into routine school communication channels is an effective way to identify children who do not have health insurance and may be eligible for state subsidized benefits.

Conclusion: 1. The Michigan Department of Community Health should lead the effort to work with the Michigan Department of Education to modify the Free and Reduced Lunch Application to capture whether or not the applicant has health insurance. 2. The Michigan Department of Community Health should lead the effort to incorporate into the direct certified free and reduced lunch eligibility process a systematic check as to whether or not the applicant has State subsidized health insurance. 3. The Michigan Department of Community Health should provide resources from the expected performance bonus to work with schools across the State to implement these changes.

Study Design: Cross-sectional pilot study

Setting: Schools (School districts in Van Buren County, Michigan)

Population of Focus: Uninsured children

Data Source: Survey data

Sample Size: 8,999 children

Age Range: School-aged children

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Provider Training/Education, Educational Material (Provider), Participation Incentives, Quality Improvement/Practice-Wide Intervention, Expert Support (Provider), Modified Billing Practices, Data Collection Training for Staff, Screening Tool Implementation Training, Office Systems Assessments and Implementation Training, Expert Feedback Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act-Tool, Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Collaboration with Local Agencies (Health Care Provider/Practice), Engagement with Payers, STATE, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS, Audit/Attestation, HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE, Audit/Attestation (Provider)

Intervention Description: The Vermont Child Health Improvement Program (VCHIP) at the University of Vermont collaborated with state agencies and professional societies to conduct a survey of Vermont pediatric and family medicine practices regarding their developmental screening and autism screening processes, referral patterns, and barriers. The survey was administered in 2009 to 103 primary care practices, with a 65% response rate (89% for pediatric practices, 53% for family medicine practices).

Intervention Results: The survey results revealed that while 88% of practices have a specific approach to developmental surveillance and 87% perform developmental screening, only 1 in 4 use structured tools with good psychometric properties. Autism screening was performed by 59% of practices, with most using the M-CHAT or CHAT tool and screening most commonly at the 18-month visit. When concerns were identified, 72% referred to a developmental pediatrician and over 50% to early intervention. Key barriers to both developmental and autism screening were lack of time, staff, and training. Over 80% of practices used a note in the patient chart to track at-risk children, and most commonly referred to child development clinics, audiology, early intervention, and pediatric specialists.

Conclusion: The survey conducted by VCHIP revealed wide variation in developmental and autism screening practices among Vermont pediatric and family medicine practices. While most practices conduct some form of screening, there is room for improvement in the use of validated tools, adherence to recommended screening ages, and implementation of office systems for tracking at-risk children. The survey identified knowledge gaps and barriers that can be addressed through quality improvement initiatives, which most respondents expressed interest in participating in.

Study Design: QE: pretest-posttest

Setting: Pediatric and family medicine practices in Vermont

Population of Focus: Children up to age 3

Data Source: Child medical record; ProPHDS Survey

Sample Size: Chart audits at 37 baseline and 35 follow-up sites (n=30 per site) Baseline charts (n=1381) - Children 19-23 months (n=697) - Children 31-35 months (n=684) Follow-up charts (n=1301) - Children 19-23 months (n=646) - Children 31-35 months (n=655)

Age Range: Not specified

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE, Provider Training/Education, HOSPITAL, Chart Audit and Feedback, Guideline Change and Implementation, Quality Improvement, Policy/Guideline (State), STATE, Collaboration with Local Agencies (Health Care Provider/Practice), Collaboratives, Policy/Guideline (Hospital)

Intervention Description: Hospitals participating in the MDPQC (Maryland Perinatal-Neonatal Quality Care Collaborative) agreed to implement practices from the "Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births" patient safety bundle, developed by the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care. As a requirement of participation, hospital teams sent at least one team member to each collaborative event. Activities included a June 2016 in-person kick off meeting for two to three representatives from each hospital to familiarize them with the cesarean delivery bundle and the requirements of participation, followed by conference calls that occurred every month in the first year and every 2 months in the second year. Additional in-person meetings for all hospital teams took place at 12 months and at the end of the collaborative (November 2018). Nice webinars on related clinical topics were presented throughout the 30-month period. The collaborative director provided facilitation support to site teams through calls and visits when requested by the site team or when site participation lapsed.

Intervention Results: Among the 26 bundle practices that were assessed, participating hospitals reported having a median of seven practices (range 0-23) already in place before the collaborative and implementing a median of four (range 0-17) new practices during the collaborative. Across the collaborative, the cesarean delivery rates decreased from 28.5% to 26.9% (P=.011) for all nulliparous term singleton vertex births and from 36.1% to 31.3% (P<.001) for nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex inductions. Five hospitals had a statistically significant decrease in nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean delivery rates and four had a significant increase. Nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean delivery rates were significantly lower across hospitals that implemented more practices in the "Response" domain of the bundle.

Conclusion: The MDPQC was associated with a statewide reduction in cesarean delivery rates for nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex births.

Setting: 31 Maryland birthing hospitals

Population of Focus: Among the 26 bundle practices that were assessed, participating hospitals reported having a median of seven practices (range 0–23) already in place before the collaborative and implementing a median of four (range 0–17) new practices during the collaborative. Across the collaborative, the cesarean delivery rates decreased from 28.5% to 26.9% (P5.011) for all nulliparous term singleton vertex births and from 36.1% to 31.3% (P,.001) for nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex inductions. Five hospitals had a statistically significant decrease in nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean delivery rates and four had a significant increase. Nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean delivery rates were significantly lower across hospitals that implemented more practices in the “Response” domain of the bundle.

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PAYER, Expanded Insurance Coverage, HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE, Public Insurance (Health Care Provider/Practice), Educational Material (Provider), Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Collaboration with Local Agencies (Health Care Provider/Practice), Nurse/Nurse Practitioner, PROFESSIONAL_CAREGIVER, Patient Navigation (Assistance), Care Coordination, STATE, Multicomponent Approach

Intervention Description: The Healthy Beginnings system of care in Atlanta, GA connects children and their families to health insurance and a medical home model of care to support children’s health and development. The main components are care management + education and parent engagement + collaborative partnerships. A registered nurse, known as the health navigator, supports parents and helps them learn how to work with health care professionals on behalf of their children; they also connect parents to the Center for Working Families to ensure that they receive public benefits for which they are eligible.

Intervention Results: Healthy Beginnings coordinated care approach has ensured that participating children and families have health insurance (97%) and receive regular immunizations (92%), ongoing health care from a primary care physician and dental health provider, and regular developmental screenings (98%) and follow-up care. Healthy Beginnings has dramatically increased children’s access to health care and forms the basis for a cost-effective approach that can be replicated in other communities.

Conclusion: By building upon the partnerships formed through the foundation’s community change effort, Healthy Beginnings has dramatically increased neighborhood children’s access to health care and forms the basis for a cost-effective approach that can be replicated in other communities.

Study Design: Program evaluation

Setting: Community (Community-based organizations in Atlanta, Georgia)

Population of Focus: Low-income young children and families

Data Source: Questionnaire data

Sample Size: 279 children

Age Range: 0-10 years

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): School-Based Family Intervention, Care Coordination, Collaboration with Local Agencies (State),

Intervention Description: Asthma imposes tremendous burden on children, families, and society. Successful management requires coordinated care among children, families, health providers, and schools. Building Bridges for Asthma Care Program, a school-centered program to coordinate care for successful asthma management, was developed, implemented, and evaluated. The program consists of five steps: (1) identify students with asthma; (2) assess asthma risk/control; (3) engage the family and student at risk; (4) provide case management and care coordination, including engagement of health-care providers; and (5) prepare for next school year. Implementation occurred in 28 schools from two large urban school districts in Colorado and Connecticut.

Intervention Results: Significant improvements were noted in the proportions of students with completed School Asthma Care Plans, a quick-relief inhaler at school, Home Asthma Action/Treatment Plans and inhaler technique (p < .01 for all variables).

Conclusion: Building Bridges for Asthma Care was successfully implemented extending asthma care to at-risk children with asthma through engagement of schools, health providers, and families.

Study Design: Program evaluation

Setting: Twenty-eight schools from two large urban school districts in Colorado and Connecticut

Population of Focus: Students with asthma in the participating schools; Families of the at-risk students; School nurses who led the program; Health-care providers engaged in the care coordination activities; Implementation teams in the two urban school districts of Colorado and Connecticut; Asthma champions within the school districts who provided guidance and support for program implementation at individual schools

Sample Size: 463 students

Age Range: Children 5 to 12 years old

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Provider Training/Education, Educational Material (Provider), Expert Support (Provider), Participation Incentives, Modified Billing Practices, Data Collection Training for Staff, Screening Tool Implementation Training, Office Systems Assessments and Implementation Training, Expert Feedback Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act-Tool, Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Collaboration with Local Agencies (Health Care Provider/Practice), Engagement with Payers, STATE, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS, Audit/Attestation, HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE, Audit/Attestation (Provider)

Intervention Description: Early identification of children with developmental and behavioral delays is important in primary care practice, and well-child visits provide an ideal opportunity to engage parents and perform periodic screening. Integration of this activity into office process and flow is necessary for making screening a routine and consistent part of primary care practice.

Intervention Results: In the North Carolina Assuring Better Child Health and Development Project, careful attention to and training for office process has resulted in a significant increase in screening rates to >70% of the designated well-child visits. The data from the project prompted a change in Medicaid policy, and screening is now statewide in primary practices that perform Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment examinations.

Conclusion: Although there are features of the project that are unique to North Carolina, there are also elements that are transferable to any practice or state interested in integrating child development services into the medical home.

Study Design: QE: pretest-posttest

Setting: Partnership for Health Management, a network within Community Care of North Carolina

Population of Focus: Children ages 6 to 60 months receiving Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment services

Data Source: Child medical record

Sample Size: Unknown number of charts – screening rates tracked in 2 counties (>20,000 screens by 2004)

Age Range: Not specified

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PAYER, Expanded Insurance Coverage, HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE, Public Insurance (Health Care Provider/Practice), PROFESSIONAL_CAREGIVER, Education/Training (caregiver), Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Educational Material (caregiver), STATE, Multicomponent Approach

Intervention Description: In New York, to maximize comprehensive insurance coverage for CYSHCN, a Service Integration Model was formed between the Office of Health Insurance Services and the Early Intervention Program. The 3 key components include educational messaging (jointly prepared messages about health insurance benefits and enrollment assistance offered by the Office of Health Insurance Services through the Early Intervention Program) + data from program databases (data matching with the Early Intervention Program) + individual counseling using program staff (incorporation of the Office of Health Insurance Services program staff—child benefit advisors—to work directly with parents of children in the Early Intervention Program to facilitate enrollment and renewal. The model overcomes enrollment barriers by using consumer friendly enrollment materials and one-on-one assistance, and shows the benefits of a comprehensive and collaborative approach to assisting families with enrollment into public health insurance.

Intervention Results: Since 2008, more than 5,000 children in the Early Intervention Program have been successfully enrolled and coverage renewed in Medicaid through the Service Integration Model. In 2008, the study team found that children in the Early Intervention Program had a 34% churning rate for Medicaid because of enrollment barriers and misconception of the Early Intervention Program as a replacement for Medicaid. By 2010, the churning rate for clients assisted through Office of Health Insurance Services was reduced from 34% to 8%. The Office of Health Insurance Services will modify the Service Integration Model to respond to New York State’s implementation of the Health Insurance Exchange required by the 2010 ACA. Partnerships across government programs and agencies offer opportunities to enroll hard-to-reach populations into public health insurance. The model reflects how government programs can work together to improve rates of enrollment and retention in public health insurance. The key elements of integration of program messages, data matching, and staff involvement allow for the model to be tailored to the specific needs of other government programs.

Conclusion: The model overcomes enrollment barriers by using consumer-friendly enrollment materials and one-on-one assistance, and shows the benefits of a comprehensive and collaborative approach to assisting families with enrollment into public health insurance.

Study Design: Program evaluation

Setting: Community (New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene's Office of Health Insurance Services and the Early Intervention Program)

Population of Focus: Uninsured and underinsured young children with special health care needs in New York City participating in the Early Intervention Program

Data Source: Evaluation data

Sample Size: 6,500 children in early intervention with a Medicaid number

Age Range: 0-3 years

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Training, Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Screening Tool Implementation,

Intervention Description: The intervention described in the article is the implementation of the EPDS screening tool during initial WIC consultations for women <12 months from delivery and providing resources for treatment options when a woman had a positive score. The article does not describe a specific strategy for implementing this intervention, but it does mention that the project involved training staff on PPD and the use of the EPDS, implementing the screening tool in the WIC clinic, and analyzing the collected data. Based on this information, it can be inferred that the strategy for implementing the intervention was a quality improvement approach that involved staff training, process changes, and data analysis to monitor and improve the screening process.

Intervention Results: Implementing PPD screening using the EPDS during initial WIC consultations for women <12 months from delivery was beneficial for this high-risk population, as it identified a higher percentage of positive scores for PPD than the national average. The study also found that providing resources for treatment options when a woman had a positive score was important for increasing the chances that they will receive treatment. Therefore, it can be inferred that increasing postpartum depression screening through the WIC program can be an effective strategy for identifying and treating PPD in this high-risk population.

Conclusion: It would be beneficial for the WIC program to screen women for PPD symptoms in this high-risk population, so that recommendations for follow-up care could be made and quality of life could be increased.

Study Design: The study design/type is not explicitly mentioned in the given texts. However, the study is described as a project that was approved by the New Mexico State University institutional review board, and it involved training staff on PPD and the use of the EPDS, implementing the screening tool in the WIC clinic, and analyzing the collected data. Based on this information, it can be inferred that the study design is a quality improvement project or a program evaluation.

Setting: The study was conducted in a Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) clinic in New Mexico.

Population of Focus: The target audience for the study is registered nurses and advance practice registered nurses.

Sample Size: The sample size is 72 women who were offered the EPDS screening tool.

Age Range: The WIC participants mentioned in the text include low-income women who are pregnant or postpartum and children up to age 5 years.

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Provider Training/Education, Expert Support (Provider), Modified Billing Practices, Screening Tool Implementation Training, Office Systems Assessments and Implementation Training, Expert Feedback Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act-Tool, Engagement with Payers, STATE, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS, Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Collaboration with Local Agencies (Health Care Provider/Practice), HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE, Audit/Attestation (Provider)

Intervention Description: This report evaluates the impact of Phase II of Maine's First STEPS initiative

Intervention Results: Average percentage of documented use of a developmental screening tool increased substantially from baseline to followup for all three age groups (46% to 97% for children under one; 22% to 71% for children 18-23 months; and 22% to 58% for children 24-35 months). Rate of developmental screening based on MaineCare claims increased from the year prior to intervention implementation to the year after implementation for all three age groups (5.3% to 17.1% for children age one; 1.5% to 13.3% for children age two; and 1.2% to 3.3% for children age 3).

Conclusion: The authors summarize lessons learned in implementing changes in practices and challenges in using CHIPRA and IHOC developmental, autism, and lead screening measures at the practice-level to inform quality improvement.

Study Design: QE: pretest-posttest

Setting: Pediatric and family practices serving children with MaineCoverage

Population of Focus: Children ages 6 to 35 months

Data Source: Child medical record; MaineCare paid claims

Sample Size: Unknown number of chart reviews from 9 practice sites completing follow-up

Age Range: Not specified

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Home Visits, Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), STATE, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS

Intervention Description: As part of a larger randomized study of the Healthy Families America home visiting program being conducted in Oregon (Healthy Families Oregon, HFO), we conducted a telephone survey with a randomly selected group of mothers to assess early outcomes at children's 1-year birthday.

Intervention Results: Results found that mothers assigned to the Healthy Families program group read more frequently to their young children, provided more developmentally supportive activities, and had less parenting stress. Children of these mothers were more likely to have received developmental screenings, and were somewhat less likely to have been identified as having a developmental challenge. Families with more baseline risk had better outcomes in some areas; however, generally there were not large differences in outcomes across a variety of subgroups of families.

Conclusion: Implications of these results for understanding which short-term program impacts are most feasible for early prevention programs, as well as for understanding how these services might be better targeted are discussed.

Study Design: RCT

Setting: Seven Health Families Oregon program sites in Oregon

Population of Focus: First-born children from birth through 36 months of age

Data Source: Parent telephone survey

Sample Size: Telephone surveys (n=803 mothers) - Intervention (n=402) - Control (n=401)

Age Range: Not specified

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Referrals, Education/Training (caregiver), STATE, PROFESSIONAL_CAREGIVER, PATIENT_CONSUMER

Intervention Description: We aimed to identify and describe the contextual factors that influence implementation of PNCC.

Intervention Results: Our findings support the need to study the implementation of perinatal public and community health interventions and consider “health in all policies.” Several changes would maximize PNCC's impact on maternal health: increased collaboration among policy stakeholders would reduce barriers; increased reimbursement would enable PNCC providers to better meet the complex needs of clients; and expansions in postpartum Medicaid coverage would extend the PNCC eligibility period.

Conclusion: Nurses who provide PNCC have unique insights that should be leveraged to inform maternal–child health policy.

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Provider Training/Education, Outreach (Provider), Patient-Centered Medical Home, Expert Support (Provider), STATE, Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Collaboration with Local Agencies (Health Care Provider/Practice), Continuity of Care (Caseload)

Intervention Description: The Illinois Child Welfare Department implemented a statewide health care system to ensure that children in foster care obtain quality health care by providing each child with a medical home.

Intervention Results: These children used the health care system more effectively and cost-effective as reflected in the higher utilization rates of primary care and well-child visits and lower utilization of emergency room care for children with chronic conditions.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the Medical Home model works for children in foster care providing better health outcomes in higher immunization rates.

Study Design: Observational: Cohort study; Survey

Setting: Illinois statewide health system

Population of Focus: Children in foster care between July 2001 and June 2009

Data Source: • Medicaid paid claims data

Sample Size: n=28934

Age Range: Not specified

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Provider Training/Education, Educational Material (Provider), Expert Support (Provider), Quality Improvement/Practice-Wide Intervention, Data Collection Training for Staff, Office Systems Assessments and Implementation Training, Expert Feedback Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act-Tool, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS, STATE, Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Collaboration with Local Agencies (Health Care Provider/Practice), Audit/Attestation, HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE, Audit/Attestation (Provider)

Intervention Description: The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility of implementing a bundle of strategies to facilitate the use of Bright Futures recommendations and to evaluate the effectiveness of a modified learning collaborative in improving preventive and developmental care.

Intervention Results: Office system changes most frequently adopted were use of recall/reminder systems (87%), a checklist to link to community resources (80%), and systematic identification of children with special health care needs (80%). From baseline to follow-up, increases were observed in the use of recall/reminder systems, the proportion of children's charts that had a preventive services prompting system, and the families who were asked about special health care needs. Of 21 possible office system components, the median number used increased from 10 to 15. Comparing scores between baseline and follow-up for each practice site, the change was significant. Teams reported that the implementation of office systems was facilitated by the perception that a component could be applied quickly and/or easily. Barriers to implementation included costs, the time required, and lack of agreement with the recommendations.

Conclusion: This project demonstrated the feasibility of implementing specific strategies for improving preventive and developmental care for young children in a wide variety of practices. It also confirmed the usefulness of a modified learning collaborative in achieving these results. This model may be useful for disseminating office system improvements to other settings that provide care for young children.

Study Design: QE: pretest-posttest

Setting: Primary care practices (15 at baseline, 8 at follow- up) throughout the US (9 states total), with most in the Midwest

Population of Focus: Children from birth through 21 years of age

Data Source: Child medical record

Sample Size: Unknown number of chart audits from 8 practice sites completing follow-up

Age Range: Not specified

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Policy/Guideline (State)

Intervention Description: Project LAUNCH incorporates Enhanced Home Visiting as a core strategy. This program pairs families with trained professionals who visit them regularly throughout the child's early years. Home visitors provide a range of supports, including: Developmental screening: Identifying potential delays or concerns in a child's development. Parenting education: Equipping caregivers with skills to promote their child's social, emotional, and cognitive development. Connection to community resources: Linking families with essential services like healthcare, early childhood education, and mental health support. Social and emotional support: Offering guidance and encouragement to parents as they navigate the challenges of raising young children.

Intervention Results: Studies evaluating Project LAUNCH's Enhanced Home Visiting program have shown promising results. Participating families report increased knowledge and confidence in their parenting skills. Additionally, children enrolled in the program demonstrate improved developmental outcomes, particularly in areas like language and social-emotional development.

Conclusion: Project LAUNCH's Enhanced Home Visiting program offers a valuable intervention for families with young children. By providing comprehensive support, education, and resources within the familiar setting of the home, the program empowers parents and fosters healthy child development. Further research is needed to explore the program's long-term impact and cost-effectiveness, but the initial findings suggest that Enhanced Home Visiting can be a powerful tool for improving the well-being of young children and their families.

Study Design: N/A

Setting: N/A

Data Source: N/A

Sample Size: N/A

Age Range: N/A

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PROVIDER/PRACTICE, Provider Training/Education, Educational Material (Provider), Expert Support (Provider), Participation Incentives, Quality Improvement/Practice-Wide Intervention, Data Collection Training for Staff, Expert Feedback Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act-Tool, Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Collaboration with Local Agencies (Health Care Provider/Practice), STATE, POPULATION-BASED SYSTEMS, Audit/Attestation, HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE, Audit/Attestation (Provider)

Intervention Description: Seven pediatric primary care practices participated in New Mexico's Developmental Screening Initiative in a year-long quality improvement project with the goal of implementing standardized developmental screening tools.

Intervention Results: At baseline, there were dramatic differences among the practices, with some not engaged in screening at all.

Conclusion: Overall, the use of standardized developmental screening increased from 27% at baseline to 92% at the end of the project.

Study Design: QE: pretest-posttest

Setting: Seven primary care practices in a large urban area and small regional community in New Mexico

Population of Focus: Children ages 1 through 60 months

Data Source: Child medical record

Sample Size: Total medical records reviewed at baseline and follow-up (n=1139)

Age Range: Not specified

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Expert Support (Provider), Continuity of Care (Caseload), STATE, HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE

Intervention Description: This study aimed to examine the association between care-management and birth outcomes (low birthweight and preterm birth rates) among high-risk non-Hispanic White and Black pregnant people enrolled in the North Carolina Pregnancy Medical Home.

Intervention Results: From January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, a total of 3564 singleton pregnancies occurred among non-Hispanic Black and White pregnant Medicaid beneficiaries, who were a part of the Pregnancy Medical Home in North Carolina. White pregnant people comprised 57% and Black pregnant people comprised 43% of the sample. In the Method 1 analysis, intensive care management was significantly associated with reductions in preterm birth and low birthweight among Black and White pregnant people whereas in the Method 2 analysis, the implementation of a risk-stratification score only resulted in a significant reduction among Black pregnant people. In multivariable logistic modeling, race, number of prenatal visits, and intensive care management were all significantly associated with the outcomes of interest.

Conclusion: Care management is associated with reductions in preterm birth and low birthweight in the Medicaid-managed Pregnancy Medical Home in North Carolina. This study contributes to a growing body of literature on the role of state-based initiatives in reducing perinatal morbidity. These results are significant as it demonstrates the importance of care coordination and management, in identifying and providing resources for high-risk pregnant people. In the United States, where pregnancy-related outcomes are poor, programs that address the multitude of economic, social, and clinical complexities are becoming increasingly crucial and necessary.

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Patient-Centered Medical Home, Enabling Services, STATE, HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE, PATIENT_CONSUMER

Intervention Description: This study assessed the Collaborative’s impact on access to coordinated care within patient-centered medical homes (PCMH).

Intervention Results: After algorithm implementation, there has been a significant decrease in the time required to establish care in PCMHs, increased provider acknowledgment of refugee status, and decreased emergency department (ED) visits. Multi-disciplinary, organized collaboration can facilitate enhanced access to care for refugee families at the population level.

Conclusion: After algorithm implementation, there has been a significant decrease in the time required to establish care in PCMHs, increased provider acknowledgment of refugee status, and decreased emergency department (ED) visits. Multi-disciplinary, organized collaboration can facilitate enhanced access to care for refugee families at the population level.

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Peer Counselor, Other Education, PATIENT_CONSUMER, STATE

Intervention Description: Once recruited and engaged, parent partners are encouraged to hold meetings with other parents within the practice to share their experiences by discussing practice processes, workflows that are related to scheduling, referral coordination, telephone callbacks, patient portal communications, practice policies, and on-call protocols. Practices within the PAMHI practice network have used this feedback to inform practice quality improvement with demonstrable results, such as improved efficiency with phone trees, better immunization rates, better customer service, and more ideas for practice events. Parent partners also participate as part of the practice’s quality improvement team, teach medical students and residents as “family faculty,” and provide support to other parents in the practice. Some PAMHI practices and their parent partners have held “resource nights,” during which they invite a group of parents along with community partners into the practice to share ideas and resources.

Intervention Results: For other states, pediatrics practices, and hospital systems that are seeking to adopt similar programs, there are several key considerations, including the following: (1) recognizing the value of and evidence for parent partners in the adoption and implementation of the medical home model, (2) identifying strategic partners to assist in training and professional development for the parent partner role in practice, (3) establishing a formal role for parent partners as equal practice team members, and (4) ensuring that parent and/or caregiver feedback is garnered from parents across the practice and using the feedback of their experiences for meaningful quality and practice improvement to uphold the quadruple aim of health care.

Conclusion: The PAMHI parent advisor and/or parent partner role can be replicated and successful in other pediatric practice settings to foster the quadruple aim of health care. The PAMHI can be used to serve as a model of how pediatric practices can adopt medical home concepts, specifically patient- and family-centered care with parent partners, into their practices. The staff members of the PAMHI have found that parent partners are successful when they possess the following qualities: • are parents and/or caregivers of CSHCN experiencing multiple systems of care; • have not recently received a new diagnosis for their children; • can provide candid feedback regarding practice policies and procedures; can promote linkages between other parents; • possess good listening and communication skills and can interact professionally with practice administration and staff; • can help support a child’s care plan; • can speak to other parents beyond their own experiences with their children; • recognize that they have valuable expertise and experiences to share; • possess resiliency, empathy, and a genuine desire to help other parents; and • have the time to devote and agree to be a parent partner.

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Patient-Centered Medical Home, STATE, HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE

Intervention Description: This issue of the Rhode Island Medical Journal (RIMJ) chronicles the development and implementation of a statewide initiative, Patient-Centered Medical Homes for Kids (PCMH-Kids), which now impacts the health care of nearly 100,000, or half of the children living in Rhode Island.

Intervention Results: integration of behavioral health (BH) into pediatric primary care was a key focus of PCMH-Kids. BH needs in children present as pre-clinical or subclinical findings, and presents emerging social-emotional challenges for children and parents.

Conclusion: This issue of the Rhode Island Medical Journal (RIMJ) chronicles the development and implementation of a statewide initiative, Patient-Centered Medical Homes for Kids (PCMH-Kids), which now impacts the health care of nearly 100,000, or half of the children living in Rhode Island.

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Patient-Centered Medical Home, HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE, STATE

Intervention Description: Each participating practice was paired with a transformation coach who assessed the practice and, with the office team, crafted a work plan to facilitate practice transformation. Plans included clarification of roles/job descriptions, team building, data capturing and reporting systems, behavioral health integration plans and care coordination needs and capabilities. All practices reported their quality metrics quarterly, uploading their data to a shared data repository. Additionally, all practices participated in collaborative learning, sharing best practices and lessons learned in quarterly meetings for care coordination, data reporting, integrated behavioral health and practice transformation.

Intervention Results: Through shared learning and practice coaching the cohort 1 practices implemented work flows and data and analysis metrics that address the contracted measures. Supported by strong transformation coaching and support, all practices achieved NCQA 3 recognition within the first contract year. In year two, 100% of the cohort 1 practices met both quality metrics for developmental screening and growth monitoring and counseling and posted improvement over time. [Figures 1 and 2] Patient and family satisfaction was high at baseline and 67% of the practices met the improvement benchmarks for customer service measure for access, communication and office staff. PCMH-Kids practices successfully decreased Emergency Department (ED) utilization and had a 2.5% reduction in ED usage compared to the peer group (rate for 1,000-member-months, excluding ERISA members).

Conclusion: PCMH-Kids practices successfully decreased Emergency Department (ED) utilization and had a 2.5% reduction in ED usage compared to the peer group (rate for 1,000-member-months, excluding ERISA members).

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PAYER, Expanded Insurance Coverage, HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE, Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), PROFESSIONAL_CAREGIVER, Outreach (caregiver), PATIENT_CONSUMER, Referrals, STATE, Mini Grants, Public Insurance (State)

Intervention Description: Small grants to community-based organizations have been shown to be effective in garnering the involvement of the local community in health promotion efforts. The Georgia Utilization Mini-grant Program leveraged modest funding and resources to promote community involvement to improve enrollment and utilization of Medicaid and CHIP services for children. It demonstrates how a state Medicaid agency can step outside its usual administrative role to play an important part in supporting local outreach and marketing efforts to promote Medicaid/CHIP enrollment and utilization.

Intervention Results: Funded community-based organizations improved utilization of children’s health services by developing innovative staffing patterns, creating new data systems for scheduling appointments and maintaining records, and forging new collaborative relationships to leverage financial support. Responses suggest that the program improved levels of enrollment, appointment-setting and referrals for social and other services. Common facilitators and barriers to success and ways to address them were also identified.

Conclusion: Elaboration on each of the facilitators of success led to the development of several recommendations as guidance for future outreach funding programs such as: staffing, data systems, collaboration and how to address incentives and barriers.

Study Design: Participatory approach

Setting: Community (Community-based organizations)

Population of Focus: Children enrolled in Medicaid and PeachCare

Data Source: Questionnaires, telephone interviews, one-on-one counseling, application assistance, home visits

Sample Size: 6 organizations

Age Range: Children; specific ages not stated

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Patient-Centered Medical Home, STATE, HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE

Intervention Description: This article summarizes the key, consensus-based financing elements to providing quality, effective, comprehensive care in the pediatric medical home: (1) first dollar coverage without deductibles, copays, or other cost-sharing for necessary preventive care services as recommended by Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents; (2) adoption of a uniform definition of medical necessity across payers that embraces services that promote optimal growth and development and prevent, diagnose, and treat the full range of pediatric physical, mental, behavioral, and developmental conditions, in accord with evidence-based science or evidence-informed expert opinion; (3) payment models that promote appropriate use of pediatric primary care and pediatric specialty services and discourage inappropriate, inefficient, or excessive use of medical services; and (4) payment models that strengthen the patient- and family-physician relationship and do not impose additional administrative burdens that will only erode the effectiveness of the medical home.

Intervention Results: Some programs are demonstrating positive results.43 On the other hand, pay-for-performance programs are still evolving. Many adult programs have features that are not pertinent to improving care provided to children or that cannot easily be translated into pediatric equivalents.

Conclusion: For a medical home for children to be both effective and fiscally viable, payers must adequately finance the full range of services required to optimize the physical, developmental, emotional, and behavioral well-being of children, which critically influence health throughout the life course. Some support is required to engage families initially with the medical home. Once engaged, appropriate support is needed for encounters, care coordination, continuous quality improvement, implementation of an effective electronic health record system, and innovative efforts to improve community health. This support should not impose additional administrative burdens that will erode the effectiveness of the medical home. Payers should consider how best to achieve better health care value without encouraging fragmented care outside the medical home.

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PAYER, Expanded Insurance Coverage, HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE, Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Public Insurance (Health Care Provider/Practice), PROFESSIONAL_CAREGIVER, Outreach (caregiver), STATE, Data Collection System

Intervention Description: Florida Covering Kids & Families (FL-CKF) is dedicated to developing outreach methods for enrolling and retaining eligible children in the state’s CHIP. FL-CKP developed a strong data system that allows it to evaluate the effectiveness and success of statewide enrollment and retention efforts. Community and school outreach partners enter data each month on all completed CHIP applications via a secure interface, and data are then transmitted to the state. The data system is an outreach method for enrolling and retaining coverage; it can also monitor outcomes and provide feedback to community outreach partners. Organizations helping uninsured children apply for health insurance may benefit from creating data collection systems to monitor project efficacy and modify outreach and enrollment strategies for greater effectiveness.

Intervention Results: The highest number of application submissions were through outreach at a child’s school or childcare facility, through a community-based organization, or through targeted outreach events. However, even though those strategies resulted in the largest number of application, approval and denial rates show which of these strategies (through a CHIPRA grant partner site or government agency) yielded the highest enrollments. This information can be further stratified by individual project partner to show which strategies are working best in that region. The improved data collection system of Cycle II enables FL-CKF to better monitor the efforts of project partners by tracking monthly progress toward grant deliverable goals.

Conclusion: Organizations helping uninsured children apply for health insurance may benefit from creating data collection systems to monitor project efficacy and modify outreach and enrollment strategies for greater effectiveness.

Study Design: Evaluation assessment

Setting: Community (Community-based organizations and schools in Florida)

Population of Focus: Eligible children in Florida's CHIP

Data Source: Checkbox Survey Solutions data system

Sample Size: 502,866 children in Florida who are uninsured

Age Range: 0-17 years

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Nurse/Nurse Practitioner, Access, Collaboration with Local Agencies (State),

Intervention Description: There is increasing demand for primary care nationally, and advanced practice registered nurses are uniquely suited to meet this demand. Academic nursing programs are responding to this challenge by expanding graduate nurse practitioner (NP) programs, but they are limited by availability of student clinical placement sites and dedicated preceptors. We addressed these limitations by developing an academic-practice partnership between a College of Nursing pediatric nurse practitioner (PNP) program and a primary care clinic within an academic pediatric hospital. A novel PNP faculty role was developed with teaching, patient care, and clinical precepting responsibilities.

Intervention Results: This partnership increased access to pediatric primary care services within the local underserved community, increased the number of teaching faculty members and clinical preceptors, and expanded clinical education opportunities for PNP students.

Conclusion: This partnership increased access to pediatric primary care services within the local underserved community, increased the number of teaching faculty members and clinical preceptors, and expanded clinical education opportunities for PNP students.

Study Design: Program evaluation

Setting: A primary care pediatric clinic within an academic pediatric hospital in Colorado

Population of Focus: College of Nursing pediatric nurse practitioner (PNP) students, clinical preceptors, and teaching faculty members who participated in the academic-practice partnership with the primary care Child Health Clinic at Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO)

Sample Size: 30 students

Age Range: Adult providers

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Collaboration with Local Agencies (State), Home Visit (caregiver), Continuity of Care (Caseload), STATE, PROFESSIONAL_CAREGIVER, HEALTH_CARE_PROVIDER_PRACTICE

Intervention Description: This study examined state-level supports and barriers for coordination of home visiting with other entities within the early childhood system of care.

Intervention Results: Forty-two (75%) of the MIECHV administrators participated in the survey. States and territories varied widely within and across the 5 domains of support for coordination. MIECHV leadership was an area of relative strength, whereas data systems and finance showed the most room for improvement. State leadership and shared goals were associated with stronger perceptions of state-level coordination.

Conclusion: The findings indicate opportunities for shared learning among states to enhance coordination infrastructure. Such efforts should include multiple stakeholder perspectives and consideration of local and organizational contexts. This work could be facilitated using the service coordination toolkit developed as part of this project.