Drew AL, Keller TE, Spencer R, Herrera C. Investigating mentor commitment in youth mentoring relationships: The role of perceived program practices. J Community Psychol. 2020 Sep;48(7):2264-2276. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22409. Epub 2020 Jul 11. PMID: 32652581.
Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Adult-led Support/Counseling/Remediation, Training, Mentor Engagement
Intervention Description: The intervention described in the study is mentoring programs for youth. The unique aspect of this mentoring program is its inclusion of mentors from programs with a wide variety of structures, models, settings, and sizes, and its accounting for between-program differences using multilevel modeling .
Intervention Results: The results of the study indicated that mentor commitment to the relationship was predicted by satisfaction, investment, and available alternatives. Additionally, the study found that setting clear expectations, pre-match training, and matching based on preferences across program types were influential in mentor commitment , .
Conclusion: The conclusion drawn from the study suggests that the investment model is applicable beyond its previous application to one-on-one mentoring to other models of mentoring, such as team or group mentoring. The study also highlights the role of setting clear expectations, pre-match training, and matching based on preferences across program types .
Study Design: a quantitative research study that utilized surveys and scales to measure mentor commitment, satisfaction, investment, available alternatives, and mentor perceptions of program practices , ,
Setting: diverse, encompassing a wide range of mentoring programs with various structures, models, settings, and sizes .
Population of Focus: mentors and youth
Sample Size: 593 mentors
Age Range: youth
Access Abstract