Skip Navigation

Strengthen the Evidence for Maternal and Child Health Programs

Sign up for MCHalert eNewsletter

Established Evidence Results

Results for Measure: Childhood Vaccination with MMR, Flu, and HPV

Below are articles that support specific interventions to advance MCH National Performance Measures (NPMs) and Standardized Measures (SMs). Most interventions contain multiple components as part of a coordinated strategy/approach.

You can filter by intervention component below and sort to refine your search.

Start a New Search


Displaying records 1 through 1 (1 total).

Salini Mohanty, Paul Delamater, Kristen Feemster & Alison M. Buttenheim (2020) 8 months to 5 days: what happened when Pennsylvania changed the vaccination regulations for provisional enrollment?, Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 16:5, 1166-1170, DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1673120 [MMR Vaccination SM]

Evidence Rating: Moderate

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): Enforcement of School Rules School Rules Assessment

Intervention Description: the study compares the proportions of provisional enrollment, medical and non-medical exemptions, and required vaccine receipt before and after the new regulations were implemented. Moving the vaccination requirement from 8 months to 5 days.

Intervention Results: The study found that after the reduced provisional period was introduced at the beginning of the 2017/18 school year, the statewide rate of provisional enrollment at kindergarten and seventh grade immediately decreased from 11.1% to 2.5% (a 77% relative decrease) 6 [Page 6]. The study also found that the percent of students entering kindergarten and seventh grade not up-to-date on vaccination decreased from 14.1% in 2016/17 to 6.1% in 2017/18 6 [Page 6]. Among kindergartners, following the provisional period reduction, there were increases in uptake of ≥2 doses of MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) vaccine and 2 doses of the Varicella vaccine. Among 7th graders, the largest improvements were seen for the first MCV (meningococcal vaccine) dose and first Tdap/TD (Tetanus and diphtheria) vaccine dose 6 [Page 6]. The study also found that the new regulations in Pennsylvania are accomplishing the goal of increasing the proportion of students who are up-to-date or in compliance with requirements for vaccines at the beginning of the school year without a significant increase in exemption rates 9 [Page 9].

Conclusion: The study concludes that the new regulations in Pennsylvania are accomplishing the goal of increasing the proportion of students who are up-to-date or in compliance with requirements for vaccines at the beginning of the school year without a significant increase in exemption rates 6 [Page 9]. The study also suggests that vaccination policies/regulations that focus on children who have started, but not completed, required vaccine series have shown to be an effective approach to increase vaccination rates at school entry 9 [Page 9]. However, the persistence of high provisional enrollment in some counties points to additional barriers to this goal in some schools and regions

Study Design: retrospective analysis of vaccination data collected from school districts in Pennsylvania from the 2014/15 school year through the 2017/18 school year for kindergartners and 7th graders

Setting: The study was conducted in Pennsylvania, United States.

Population of Focus: Researchers, scholars, healthcare professionals, and individuals with an interest in biomedical and health-related topics.

Sample Size: The study analyzed vaccination data reported to the Pennsylvania Department of Health for all students in kindergarten and seventh grade in the state during the 2016/17 and 2017/18 school years.

Age Range: 5/13/2024

Access Abstract

The MCH Library is one of six special collections at Georgetown University, the nation's oldest Jesuit institution of higher education. The library is supported through foundation, private, university, state, and federal funding. This information or content and conclusions are those of the authors and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by Georgetown University or the U.S. Government. Note: web pages whose development was supported by federal government grants are being reviewed to comply with applicable Executive Orders.