Skip Navigation

Strengthen the Evidence for Maternal and Child Health Programs

Sign up for MCHalert eNewsletter

Established Evidence Results

Results for Measure: Breastfeeding

Below are articles that support specific interventions to advance MCH National Performance Measures (NPMs) and Standardized Measures (SMs). Most interventions contain multiple components as part of a coordinated strategy/approach.

You can filter by intervention component below and sort to refine your search.

Start a New Search


Displaying records 1 through 5 (5 total).

Francis, J., Mildon, A., Stewart, S., Underhill, B., Ismail, S., Di Ruggiero, E., ... & O’Connor, D. L. (2021). Breastfeeding rates are high in a prenatal community support program targeting vulnerable women and offering enhanced postnatal lactation support: a prospective cohort study. International journal for equity in health, 20(1), 1-13.

Evidence Rating: Emerging Evidence

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT_CONSUMER, Educational Material, Lactation Consultant, Provision of Breastfeeding Item, Group Education, Incentives, Professional Support, COMMUNITY, Individual Supports,

Intervention Description: The Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program (CPNP) aims to improve birth outcomes and promote and support breastfeeding among vulnerable women. Using charitable donations, the Parkdale Parents' Primary Prevention Project (5Ps) CPNP provides postnatal lactation support to its clients in addition to standard prenatal services (group education workshops, individualized support from public health nurses and dieticians, community referrals, snacks, two public transit tokens, grocery store gift card, self-serve food bank, and childcare). This lactation support program was designed and implemented by 5Ps CPNP staff and includes three components: 1) gift package of breastfeeding and infant care supplies; 2) IBCLC visits within 48 h of referral; and 3) double electric breast pump.

Intervention Results: Ninety-one percent of participants were born outside of Canada; 55% had incomes below the Low-Income Cut-Off; and 55% reported food insecurity. All participants initiated breastfeeding, 84% continued for 6 months and 16% exclusively breastfed for 6 months. Among breastfed infants, ≥76% received vitamin D supplementation. Approximately 50% of infants were introduced to solids before 6 months. Only high school education or less and food insecurity were associated with lower breastfeeding rates. Overall, 75% of participants received at least one visit with a lactation consultant and 95% of these received a breast pump.

Conclusion: This study provides initial evidence that postnatal lactation support can be delivered within a CPNP site, with high uptake by clients. While all participants initiated breastfeeding and 84% continued for 6 months, adherence to the recommended 6 months of exclusive breastfeeding was low. Further research is needed to better understand the barriers to exclusive breastfeeding and how to support this practice among vulnerable women.

Study Design: Evaluation data

Setting: A Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program site in Toronto

Population of Focus: Pregnant women in the catchment area

Sample Size: 199 women

Age Range: Women 18 years and older

Access Abstract

Relton, C., Strong, M., Thomas, K. J., Whelan, B., Walters, S. J., Burrows, J., ... & Renfrew, M. J. (2018). Effect of financial incentives on breastfeeding: a cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA pediatrics, 172(2), e174523-e174523.

Evidence Rating: Emerging Evidence

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT_CONSUMER, Incentives,

Intervention Description: The effect of financial incentives to improve breastfeeding prevalence is unknown. The Nourishing Start for Health (NOSH) trial, a cluster randomized trial with 6 to 8 weeks follow-up, was conducted between April 1, 2015 and March 31, 2016, in 92 electoral ward areas in England with baseline breastfeeding prevalence at 6 to 8 weeks post partum less than 40%. Usual care was delivered by clinicians (mainly midwives, health visitors) in a variety of maternity, neonatal, and infant feeding services, all of which were implementing the UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative standards. Shopping vouchers worth £40 (US$50) were offered to mothers 5 times based on infant age (2 days, 10 days, 6-8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months), conditional on the infant receiving any breast milk.

Intervention Results: In the intervention (5398 mother-infant dyads) and control (4612 mother-infant dyads) group, the median (interquartile range) percentage of women aged 16 to 44 years was 36.2% (3.0%) and 37.4% (3.6%) years, respectively. After adjusting for baseline breastfeeding prevalence and local government area and weighting to reflect unequal cluster-level breastfeeding prevalence variances, a difference in mean 6- to 8-week breastfeeding prevalence of 5.7 percentage points (37.9% vs 31.7%; 95% CI for adjusted difference, 2.7% to 8.6%; P < .001) in favor of the intervention vs usual care was observed. No significant differences were observed for the mean prevalence of breastfeeding initiation (61.9% vs 57.5%; adjusted mean difference, 2.9 percentage points; 95%, CI, −0.4 to 6.2; P = .08) or the mean prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 to 8 weeks (27.0% vs 24.1%; adjusted mean difference, 2.3 percentage points; 95% CI, −0.2 to 4.8; P = .07).

Conclusion: Financial incentives may improve breastfeeding rates in areas with low baseline prevalence. Offering a financial incentive to women in areas of England with breastfeeding rates below 40% compared with usual care resulted in a modest but statistically significant increase in breastfeeding prevalence at 6 to 8 weeks. This was measured using routinely collected data.

Study Design: Cluster randomized trial

Setting: Electoral wards in England

Population of Focus: Mother-infant dyads residing in the 92 study electoral ward areas

Sample Size: 10,010 mother-infant dyads

Age Range: Mothers aged 16 to 44 years

Access Abstract

Sciacca J, Phipps B, Dube D, Ratliff M. Influences on breast-feeding by lower-income women: an incentive-based, partner-supported educational program. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995;95(3):323- 328.

Evidence Rating: Emerging Evidence

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT/CONSUMER, Incentives, Group Education

Intervention Description: To determine the effects of a partner-supported, incentive-based educational program on rates and duration of breast-feeding among low-income women.

Intervention Results: Women in the intervention group reported a higher percentage of breast-feeding at all measurement times.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that incentives, such as donated prizes, can be used to attract primiparous women from lower socioeconomic groups, along with their partners, to participate in educational interventions designed to promote breast-feeding. Participation by couples in breast-feeding promotion activities can dramatically increase the rate and duration of breast-feeding.

Study Design: QE: non-equivalent control group

Setting: 2 WIC clinics in Flagstaff, AZ

Population of Focus: Primiparous women with an expected due date between May and Dec 1992

Data Source: Mother self-report

Sample Size: Intervention (n=26) Control (n=26)

Age Range: Not specified

Access Abstract

Ware, J. L., Love, D., Ladipo, J., Paddy, K., Starr, M., Gilliam, J., ... & Baker, T. (2021). African American Breastfeeding Peer Support: All Moms Empowered to Nurse. Breastfeeding Medicine, 16(2), 156-164.

Evidence Rating: Emerging Evidence

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT_CONSUMER, Peer Counselor, Educational Material, Group Education, Incentives,

Intervention Description: The AMEN (originally "Avondale Moms Empowered to Nurse;" remaned to "All Moms Empowered to Nurse") project was the first Peer-to-Peer (Mom-to-Mom) breastfeeding education and support project in Avondale, a neighborhood in Hamilton County, Ohio. AMEN was designed to provide Peer-to-Peer (Mom-to-Mom) breastfeeding education and support, specifically for African American mothers living in neighborhoods of poverty, to increase breastfeeding initiation and duration. The peer support group typically met one to two times per month with the provision of childcare, transportation, refreshments, and grocery gift card incentives. Group activities included sharing of a breastfeeding topic of interest by Champion moms, various interactive activities (e.g., breastfeeding Jeopardy), and faciliated sharing by attendees, in addition to special guest presentations. With the COVID-19 pandemic, the group pivoted to the virtual world (Zoom) allowing even more mothers to join.

Intervention Results: Since May 2017, 67 AMEN support meetings have included 158 participants, with average attendance of 10 (range 5–19) per meeting. In addition to 8 Champions, 110 moms have attended, including 24% expecting mothers. Additional attendees include 13 family support persons, 23 guest speakers, and 12 from community outreach programs. Qualitative feedback from participants has been uniformly positive. Breastfeeding initiation rates have increased 12% in the initial neighborhood.

Conclusion: Harnessing strength within the local community, Champion Breastfeeding Moms have successfully launched AMEN breastfeeding support groups in under-resourced African American urban neighborhoods, helping more mothers reach their breastfeeding goals.

Study Design: Mixed methods

Setting: Home visitation program, Every Child Succeeds, at Carmel Presbyterian Church in partnership with the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in the Avondale neighborhood

Population of Focus: Participants in the AMEN peer support program

Sample Size: 67 support meetings with a total of 158 participants (8 champions, 110 mothers, 13 family support persons, 23 guest speakers, and 12 from community outreach programs)

Age Range: Not reported

Access Abstract

Washio, Y., Humphreys, M., Colchado, E., Sierra-Ortiz, M., Zhang, Z., Collins, B. N., ... & Kirby, K. C. (2017). Incentive-based intervention to maintain breastfeeding among low-income Puerto Rican mothers. Pediatrics, 139(3).

Evidence Rating: Emerging Evidence

Intervention Components (click on component to see a list of all articles that use that intervention): PATIENT_CONSUMER, Incentives,

Intervention Description: Incentives that are immediately delivered contingent on verified occurence of a specific observable behavior have been effective in encouraging healthy behavior change. This study examined the hypothesis that monthly financial incentives would significantly increase the proportion of breastfeeding mothers at 6 months postpartum compared with WIC services only among low-income, urban Puerto Rican mothers.

Intervention Results: The intent-to-treat analysis showed significantly higher percentages of breastfeeding mothers in the incentive group at each time point compared with those in the control group (89% vs 44%, P = .01 at 1 month; 89% vs 17%, P < .001 at 3 months; 72% vs 0%, P < .001 at 6 months). No significant differences were detected at any time point between study groups for self-reported exclusive breastfeeding rate and infant outcomes (ie, weight, emergency department visits).

Conclusion: Contingent cash incentives significantly increased breastfeeding through 6-month postpartum among WIC-enrolled Puerto Rican mothers; however, no significant differences between the study groups were observed on exclusive breastfeeding rate and infant outcomes. Larger-scale studies are warranted to examine efficacy, implementation potential, and cost-effectiveness.

Study Design: Randomized, 2-arm parallel-group design

Setting: WIC program

Population of Focus: WIC-enrolled Puerto Rican mothers

Sample Size: 36 women

Age Range: Mothers 18-29 years of age

Access Abstract

The MCH Digital Library is one of six special collections at Geogetown University, the nation's oldest Jesuit institution of higher education. It is supported in part by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under award number U02MC31613, MCH Advanced Education Policy with an award of $700,000/year. The library is also supported through foundation and univerity funding. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.