Skip Navigation

Strengthen the Evidence for Maternal and Child Health Programs

Sign up for MCHalert eNewsletter

Search Results: MCHLine

Items in this list may be obtained from the sources cited. Contact information reflects the most current data about the source that has been provided to the MCH Digital Library.

Displaying records 1 through 1 (1 total).

2018. New York's Title V CYSHCN program: Using the national standards as a framework for action planning and data analysis. Washington, DC: Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs; [Portland, ME; Washington, DC]: National Academy for State Health Policy, 2 pp.

Annotation: This case study examines how New York State's Title V program leveraged the National Standards for Systems of Care for Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs (CYSHCN) as a framework for improving healthcare delivery and system analysis. Operating through the Division of Family Health within the New York State Department of Health, the program conducted an extensive systems mapping project that included interviews with over 130 diverse families of CYSHCN. This comprehensive analysis revealed the primary needs for improvement, and highlights how New York aligned its improvement efforts with both the National Standards and other guidelines like the American Academy of Pediatrics' Bright Futures, while emphasizing family engagement as a core principle. The state found that linking their work to the National Standards enhanced stakeholder support and plans to continue using this framework to strengthen their healthcare system, ensuring consistency, equal access, and comprehensive support for CYSHCN and their families.

Keywords: Title V Programs, New York, Standards, Data Analysis, Family Support Services, CHSCN programs
   

The MCH Library is one of six special collections at Georgetown University, the nation's oldest Jesuit institution of higher education. The library is supported through foundation, private, university, state, and federal funding. This information or content and conclusions are those of the authors and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by Georgetown University or the U.S. Government. Note: web pages whose development was supported by federal government grants are being reviewed to comply with applicable Executive Orders.