MCH Alert


Maternal and Child Health Library

This and past issues of the MCH Alert are available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html


July 16, 2010

Special Notice: In recognition of the history of its programs, the Maternal and Child Health Bureau is planning a special Federal-State Maternal and Child Health Partnership Meeting to commemorate the 75th Anniversary of Title V of the Social Security Act. The meeting will be held on October 20, 2010, in Washington, DC. Local and state events to promote broad engagement of MCH leaders and enthusiasts, to celebrate the achievements of this program, and to determine the program’s future directions are encouraged. Ideas for planning local celebrations, a poster, and a Web widget (an application that may be added to Web pages, blogs, and community profiles) are available at http://www.hrsa.gov/ourstories/mchb75th/index.html

In recognition of this anniversary, MCH Alert will periodically feature resources from the Maternal and Child Health Library's Historical Collection. This week's featured resource is Infant Care (1935 edition). This booklet for parents was first published by the Children's Bureau in 1914 and was updated numerous times through its final edition in 1989. The 1935 edition includes information on registering an infant’s birth and addresses the following topics: the new baby; development of the baby; keeping the baby well; the home; clothes; baths; care of special organs; teeth; sleep; outdoor life; exercise; play; habits, training, and discipline; feeding; the small, delicate, or premature baby; the sick baby; and taking the baby to the country. The booklet is available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/history/chbu/3121-1935.PDF

Other Children's Bureau parent brochures and booklets from the MCH Library's historical collection are available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/history/chbu/parents.html

1. Brief Explores Opportunities for Health Plans to Support Perinatal Oral Health Care
2. Policy Center Releases Multimedia Resources to Support State Home Visiting Systems
3. Article Identifies Characteristics of Planned and Unplanned Home Births
4. Authors Examine Impact of Citizenship Documentation Requirements on Access to Medicaid for Pregnant Women in Oregon

************************************************************

1. BRIEF EXPLORES OPPORTUNITIES FOR HEALTH PLANS TO SUPPORT PERINATAL ORAL HEALTH CARE

Improving Access to Perinatal Oral Health Care: Strategies and Considerations for Health Plans explores how oral health practices and use of oral health care among pregnant women may affect a woman's overall health, her birth outcome, and the oral health of her children. The issue brief was published by the Children's Dental Health Project and the National Institute of Healthcare Management Foundation with support from the Health Resources and Services Administration's Maternal and Child Health Bureau. The authors review guidelines and statements developed by professional organizations and states that instruct health professionals on providing oral health care to pregnant women to prevent dental caries and periodontal disease, deliver appropriate treatment, and mitigate the costs of untreated disease. They also explain how client, physician, work force, and financial barriers limit use of perinatal oral health care and conclude with opportunities for health plans to play a role in removing these barriers to ensure that all pregnant women have access to needed care. The brief is available at http://www.nihcm.org/pdf/NIHCM-OralHealth-Final.pdf

************************************************************

2. POLICY CENTER RELEASES MULTIMEDIA RESOURCES TO SUPPORT STATE HOME VISITING SYSTEMS

Successful Early Childhood Home Visitation State Systems focused on successful early childhood home visitation state systems across the country that are expanding high-quality home visiting services for families and young children. The Webinar, held on June 22, 2010, and sponsored by the Zero to Three Policy Center, highlighted four states' (Colorado's, New Jersey's, Virginia's, and Washington's) components of home visitation systems and discussed state planning efforts for the home visiting funds designated by the recently passed Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The Webinar recording and additional resources released in conjunction with the Webinar are available at http://www.zerotothree.org/public-policy/webinars-conference-calls/home-visitation-webinar.html

Resources include the following:

* Building Successful Early Childhood Home Visitation State Systems (presentation) at http://www.zerotothree.org/public-policy/webinars-conference-calls/home-visiting-webinar-ppt.ppt

* Key Components of a Successful Early Childhood Home Visitation System: A Self-Assessment Tool for States at http://www.zerotothree.org/public-policy/webinars-conference-calls/home-visitation-tool-june-16-2010.pdf

One-page descriptions of model states are also available as follows:

* Colorado
http://www.zerotothree.org/public-policy/webinars-conference-calls/co-one-pager.pdf

* New Jersey
http://www.zerotothree.org/public-policy/webinars-conference-calls/nj-one-pager.pdf

* Virginia
http://www.zerotothree.org/public-policy/webinars-conference-calls/va-one-pager.pdf

* Washington
http://www.zerotothree.org/public-policy/webinars-conference-calls/wa-one-pager.pdf

************************************************************

3. ARTICLE IDENTIFIES CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANNED AND UNPLANNED HOME BIRTHS

"This study identifies [a] high-risk group that has received little attention: unplanned home births," write the authors of an article published in the July 2010 issue of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Home birth is a rare occurrence in the United States; for the past 40 years, the rate of all out-of-hospital births in the United States has been approximately 1 percent of all births. One basic difficulty in analyses of home births in the United States has been that, given the infrequency of home birth, data for a large population are typically needed to reliably explore trends or examine outcomes. Also, until recently, birth certificate data regarding place of birth did not distinguish between planned and unplanned home births. This article uses a new measure added to the U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth (2003 Revision) that identifies planning status, enabling the profiling of both planned and unplanned births that ultimately occur at home in the 19 states that have adopted the revised birth certificate. This article profiles planned and unplanned home births in the United States in 2006 in this 19-state reporting area.

The study examined characteristics of planned and unplanned home births in the United States. Because the majority of births (99 percent) in the United States occurred in hospitals, the authors compared the characteristics of planned and unplanned home births to those that occurred in hospitals. Data were examined by maternal age, race or ethnicity, education, marital status, live birth order, birthplace of mother, gestational age, prenatal care, smoking status, state, population of county of residence, and birth attendant.

The authors found that
The authors conclude that "this study illustrates the clear distinction between planned and unplanned home births and the value of continually refining our vital statistics measures to better document trends in, and to analyze the implications of, changing birth practices in the United States."

Declercq E, MacDorman M, Menacker F. 2010. Characteristics of planned and unplanned home births in 19 states. Obstetrics and Gynecology 116(1):93-99. Abstract available at http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Abstract/2010/07000/Characteristics_of_Planned_and_Unplanned_Home.16.aspx

Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library resource:

- Preconception and Pregnancy: Knowledge Path at
http://mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_pregnancy.html#Childbirth

************************************************************

4. AUTHORS EXAMINE IMPACT OF CITIZENSHIP DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS ON ACCESS TO MEDICAID FOR PREGNANT WOMEN IN OREGON

"In Oregon, we observed a 25 [percent] increase in the mean number of days from Medicaid application to authorization in the 9 months following the DRA [Deficit Reduction Act] citizenship documentation requirements, and a significant increase in the proportion of eligible pregnant women who waited over 30 and 45 days to receive Medicaid coverage authorization, as compared to the pre-DRA nine-month study period," state the authors of an article published online (ahead of print) in the Maternal and Child Health Journal on July 3, 2010. In Oregon, 15 percent of all PRAMS respondents reported delaying prenatal care owing to lack of insurance, confirming that the timing of coverage can directly impact the timing of a woman's first prenatal visit and subsequent pregnancy care. The DRA citizenship documentation mandate was implemented in Oregon on September 1, 2006, after which all new and returning Medicaid applicants were required to provide primary evidence of citizenship to be authorized for coverage. The authors of the article hypothesized that the new citizenship requirements would affect the length of time that eligible women waited between application and authorization for Medicaid owing to increased processing and administrative time and time needed to obtain additional documentation. To test the hypothesis, the authors examined whether the new DRA citizenship documentation requirements delayed Medicaid authorization for newly pregnant women in Oregon.

The researchers conducted a pre-post analysis, comparing administrative Medicaid enrollment data 9 months before and after September 1, 2006, with the following objectives: (1) to determine whether eligible applicants had experienced a mean increase in the number of days from application to authorization after DRA implementation and (2) to determine whether there had been an increase in eligible applicants waiting more than 7 days, 30 days, and 45 days between application and authorization.

The authors found that
"Longer wait times may delay prenatal care initiation, and waiting an additional 30 or 45 days may critically delay or preclude screening and interventions that are recommended in early stages of pregnancy," state the authors. "Additional research should examine the extent to which authorization delays caused women to delay entering prenatal care and impacts of delay on perinatal health and birth outcomes."

Bauer J, Angus L, Fischler N, et al. 2010. The impact of citizenship documentation requirements on access to Medicaid for pregnant women in Oregon. Maternal and Child Health Journal [published online ahead of print on July 3, 2010]. Abstract available at http://www.springerlink.com/content/mm6h4k3300654712/?p=a10d15e7c6ff46928202610ff8e9a77e&pi=0

************************************************************

 To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.

To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.

************************************************************

MCH Library shares notices of new issues of MCH Alert on Twitter at http://bit.ly/OKv5Y

************************************************************

MCH Alert © 1998-2010 by National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert is produced by Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health under its cooperative agreement (U02MC00001) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal purposes.
 
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others. For all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to mchalert@ncemch.org.

The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions. Please contact us at the address below.

EDITOR/ADMINISTRATOR: Jolene Bertness, M.Ed.
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez, M.S.L.S.
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel, M.A.
WRITER: Beth DeFrancis, M.L.S.

MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert

************************************************************