
Maternal and Child Health Library
This and past issues of the MCH Alert are available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html
July 16, 2010
Special Notice: In recognition of the history of its programs, the
Maternal and Child Health Bureau is planning a special Federal-State
Maternal and Child Health Partnership Meeting to commemorate the 75th
Anniversary of Title V of the Social Security Act. The meeting will be
held on October 20, 2010, in Washington, DC. Local and state events to
promote broad engagement of MCH leaders and enthusiasts, to celebrate
the achievements of this program, and to determine the program’s future
directions are encouraged. Ideas for planning local celebrations, a
poster, and a Web widget (an application that may be added to Web
pages, blogs, and community profiles) are available at http://www.hrsa.gov/ourstories/mchb75th/index.html
In recognition of this anniversary, MCH Alert will periodically feature
resources from the Maternal and Child Health Library's Historical
Collection. This week's featured resource is Infant Care (1935
edition). This booklet for parents was first published by the
Children's Bureau in 1914 and was updated numerous times through its
final edition in 1989. The 1935 edition includes information on
registering an infant’s birth and addresses the following topics: the
new baby; development of the baby; keeping the baby well; the home;
clothes; baths; care of special organs; teeth; sleep; outdoor life;
exercise; play; habits, training, and discipline; feeding; the small,
delicate, or premature baby; the sick baby; and taking the baby to the
country. The booklet is available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/history/chbu/3121-1935.PDF
Other Children's Bureau parent brochures and booklets from the MCH
Library's historical collection are available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/history/chbu/parents.html
1. Brief Explores Opportunities for Health Plans to
Support Perinatal Oral Health Care
2. Policy Center Releases Multimedia Resources to Support
State Home Visiting Systems
3. Article Identifies Characteristics of Planned and
Unplanned Home Births
4. Authors Examine Impact of Citizenship Documentation
Requirements on Access to Medicaid for Pregnant Women in Oregon
************************************************************
1. BRIEF EXPLORES OPPORTUNITIES FOR HEALTH PLANS TO SUPPORT
PERINATAL ORAL HEALTH CARE
Improving Access to Perinatal Oral Health Care: Strategies and
Considerations for Health Plans explores how oral health practices and
use of oral health care among pregnant women may affect a woman's
overall health, her birth outcome, and the oral health of her children.
The issue brief was published by the Children's Dental Health Project
and the National Institute of Healthcare Management Foundation with
support from the Health Resources and Services Administration's
Maternal and Child Health Bureau. The authors review guidelines and
statements developed by professional organizations and states that
instruct health professionals on providing oral health care to pregnant
women to prevent dental caries and periodontal disease, deliver
appropriate treatment, and mitigate the costs of untreated disease.
They also explain how client, physician, work force, and financial
barriers limit use of perinatal oral health care and conclude with
opportunities for health plans to play a role in removing these
barriers to ensure that all pregnant women have access to needed care.
The brief is available at http://www.nihcm.org/pdf/NIHCM-OralHealth-Final.pdf
************************************************************
2. POLICY CENTER RELEASES MULTIMEDIA RESOURCES TO SUPPORT STATE HOME
VISITING SYSTEMS
Successful Early Childhood Home Visitation State Systems focused on
successful early childhood home visitation state systems across the
country that are expanding high-quality home visiting services for
families and young children. The Webinar, held on June 22, 2010, and
sponsored by the Zero to Three Policy Center, highlighted four states'
(Colorado's, New Jersey's, Virginia's, and Washington's) components of
home visitation systems and discussed state planning efforts for the
home visiting funds designated by the recently passed Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act. The Webinar recording and
additional resources released in conjunction with the Webinar are
available at http://www.zerotothree.org/public-policy/webinars-conference-calls/home-visitation-webinar.html
Resources include the following:
* Building Successful Early Childhood Home Visitation State Systems
(presentation) at http://www.zerotothree.org/public-policy/webinars-conference-calls/home-visiting-webinar-ppt.ppt
* Key Components of a Successful Early Childhood Home Visitation
System: A Self-Assessment Tool for States at http://www.zerotothree.org/public-policy/webinars-conference-calls/home-visitation-tool-june-16-2010.pdf
One-page descriptions of model states are also available as follows:
* Colorado
http://www.zerotothree.org/public-policy/webinars-conference-calls/co-one-pager.pdf
* New Jersey
http://www.zerotothree.org/public-policy/webinars-conference-calls/nj-one-pager.pdf
* Virginia
http://www.zerotothree.org/public-policy/webinars-conference-calls/va-one-pager.pdf
* Washington
http://www.zerotothree.org/public-policy/webinars-conference-calls/wa-one-pager.pdf
************************************************************
3. ARTICLE IDENTIFIES CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANNED AND UNPLANNED HOME
BIRTHS
"This study identifies [a] high-risk group that has received little
attention: unplanned home births," write the authors of an article
published in the July 2010 issue of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Home
birth is a rare occurrence in the United States; for the past 40 years,
the rate of all out-of-hospital births in the United States has been
approximately 1 percent of all births. One basic difficulty in analyses
of home births in the United States has been that, given the
infrequency of home birth, data for a large population are typically
needed to reliably explore trends or examine outcomes. Also, until
recently, birth certificate data regarding place of birth did not
distinguish between planned and unplanned home births. This article
uses a new measure added to the U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth
(2003 Revision) that identifies planning status, enabling the profiling
of both planned and unplanned births that ultimately occur at home in
the 19 states that have adopted the revised birth certificate. This
article profiles planned and unplanned home births in the United States
in 2006 in this 19-state reporting area.
The study examined characteristics of planned and unplanned home births
in the United States. Because the majority of births (99 percent) in
the United States occurred in hospitals, the authors compared the
characteristics of planned and unplanned home births to those that
occurred in hospitals. Data were examined by maternal age, race or
ethnicity, education, marital status, live birth order, birthplace of
mother, gestational age, prenatal care, smoking status, state,
population of county of residence, and birth attendant.
The authors found that
- Of the 11,787 home births with planning status recorded in the 19
states studies, 9,810 (83.2 percent) were identified as planned home
births.
- The percentage of all births that occurred at home that were
planned varied from 54.2 percent to 98.1 percent across states.
- Among mothers with planned home births, 90 percent were
non-Hispanic white. Less than half of mothers having hospital (49.7
percent) or unplanned home births (44.5 percent) were non-Hispanic
white.
- Mothers having planned home births were more likely to be older
than 30 (52 percent), married (91.7 percent), born in the United States
(91.4 percent), nonsmokers (97.8 percent) and to have at least some
college education (54.9 percent) and a gestation of 37 or more weeks
(96.9 percent) than mothers having unplanned home births or hospital
births.
- Almost 20 percent of unplanned home births were to mothers who
smoked, and most (54 percent) were to mothers who were unmarried.
- Births attended by "other" attendants were more than twice as
likely for unplanned compared with planned births. "Other" attendants
may include any other person (besides a physician or certified
professional midwife) who delivered the neonate.
- Premature births accounted for 25.6 percent of unplanned home
births, compared with 3.1 percent of planned home births.
The authors conclude that "this study illustrates the clear distinction
between planned and unplanned home births and the value of continually
refining our vital statistics measures to better document trends in,
and to analyze the implications of, changing birth practices in the
United States."
Declercq E, MacDorman M, Menacker F. 2010. Characteristics of planned
and unplanned home births in 19 states. Obstetrics and Gynecology
116(1):93-99. Abstract available at http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Abstract/2010/07000/Characteristics_of_Planned_and_Unplanned_Home.16.aspx
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resource:
- Preconception and Pregnancy: Knowledge Path at
http://mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_pregnancy.html#Childbirth
************************************************************
4. AUTHORS EXAMINE IMPACT OF CITIZENSHIP DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS ON
ACCESS TO MEDICAID FOR PREGNANT WOMEN IN OREGON
"In Oregon, we observed a 25 [percent] increase in the mean number of
days from Medicaid application to authorization in the 9 months
following the DRA [Deficit Reduction Act] citizenship documentation
requirements, and a significant increase in the proportion of eligible
pregnant women who waited over 30 and 45 days to receive Medicaid
coverage authorization, as compared to the pre-DRA nine-month study
period," state the authors of an article published online (ahead of
print) in the Maternal and Child Health Journal on July 3, 2010. In
Oregon, 15 percent of all PRAMS respondents reported delaying prenatal
care owing to lack of insurance, confirming that the timing of coverage
can directly impact the timing of a woman's first prenatal visit and
subsequent pregnancy care. The DRA citizenship documentation mandate
was implemented in Oregon on September 1, 2006, after which all new and
returning Medicaid applicants were required to provide primary evidence
of citizenship to be authorized for coverage. The authors of the
article hypothesized that the new citizenship requirements would affect
the length of time that eligible women waited between application and
authorization for Medicaid owing to increased processing and
administrative time and time needed to obtain additional documentation.
To test the hypothesis, the authors examined whether the new DRA
citizenship documentation requirements delayed Medicaid authorization
for newly pregnant women in Oregon.
The researchers conducted a pre-post analysis, comparing administrative
Medicaid enrollment data 9 months before and after September 1, 2006,
with the following objectives: (1) to determine whether eligible
applicants had experienced a mean increase in the number of days from
application to authorization after DRA implementation and (2) to
determine whether there had been an increase in eligible applicants
waiting more than 7 days, 30 days, and 45 days between application and
authorization.
The authors found that
- The mean number of days between Medicaid application and
authorization for coverage rose by 25 percent in the 9 months following
citizenship documentation requirements, from 18 days to 22.6 days.
- In the 9 months following DRA implementation, the percentage of
applicants waiting more than 7 days for coverage authorization
increased significantly, from 67.8 to 76.0 percent; the proportion of
applicants waiting over 30 days for authorization rose from 18.9 to
27.8 percent. There was also a significant increase in the proportion
of women who waited longer than 45 days.
- The significant increase in the proportion of applicants that
waited over 30 days or beyond the standard 45-day period increased most
sharply in the months immediately following DRA implementation and
remained consistently higher than proportions observed before September
2006.
"Longer wait times may delay prenatal care initiation, and waiting an
additional 30 or 45 days may critically delay or preclude screening and
interventions that are recommended in early stages of pregnancy," state
the authors. "Additional research should examine the extent to which
authorization delays caused women to delay entering prenatal care and
impacts of delay on perinatal health and birth outcomes."
Bauer J, Angus L, Fischler N, et al. 2010. The impact of citizenship
documentation requirements on access to Medicaid for pregnant women in
Oregon. Maternal and Child Health Journal [published online ahead of
print on July 3, 2010]. Abstract available at http://www.springerlink.com/content/mm6h4k3300654712/?p=a10d15e7c6ff46928202610ff8e9a77e&pi=0
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line. You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Library shares notices of new issues of MCH Alert on Twitter at http://bit.ly/OKv5Y
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2010 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health under its cooperative agreement
(U02MC00001) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
EDITOR/ADMINISTRATOR: Jolene Bertness, M.Ed.
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez, M.S.L.S.
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel, M.A.
WRITER: Beth DeFrancis, M.L.S.
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert
************************************************************