
Maternal and Child Health Library
This and past issues of the MCH Alert are available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html
December 18, 2009
************************************************************
Readers: The next issue of MCH Alert will be published on January 8,
2010. Happy holidays!
************************************************************
1. Web Site Offers Pediatric Health Information for
Parents
2. Review Documents Extensive Variability of Terminology
and Criteria for Levels of Neonatal Care Services
3. Findings Emphasize the Importance of Influenza
Surveillance
4. Study Examines Use of Oral Health Services and Access
to Care Among Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
5. Article Explores Trends and Factors Associated with
Infant Sleep Position
************************************************************
1. WEB SITE OFFERS PEDIATRIC HEALTH INFORMATION FOR PARENTS
healthychildren.org is a new Web site designed for families seeking
child and adolescent health information consistent with the American
Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP's) policies and guidelines. The site
contains information on more than 300 topics compiled from AAP
parenting books, patient-education materials, and fact sheets. Content
is organized into the following sections: Ages and Stages (prenatal to
young adulthood), Healthy Living, Safety and Prevention, Family Life,
Health Issues, News, and Tips and Tools. The site is also searchable by
keyword, topic, age, or gender. An Ask the Pediatrician corner provides
a searchable database of current health issues. The Hot Topics area
presents news and guidance on medication safety alerts, product
recalls, and information generated by AAP such as new policy statements
and public-awareness campaigns. Parents may also opt to register with
the site, customize the view, and receive information specific to their
needs. The Web site is available at http://www.healthychildren.org.
************************************************************
2. REVIEW DOCUMENTS EXTENSIVE VARIABILITY OF TERMINOLOGY AND CRITERIA
FOR LEVELS OF NEONATAL CARE SERVICES
"We provide the first comprehensive survey of state specific regulatory
language defining hospital neonatal services in the United States,"
state the authors of an article published in the December 2009 issue of
the Journal of Perinatology. Hospital services for care of the newborn
have transitioned from defining services by units or spaces to a
stratification of care requirements. Although terminology and concepts
for service designations have been documented, such as those outlined
in Guidelines for Perinatal Care (GPC) editions one to five published
by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists, high-risk perinatal services have not
always developed in parallel. A voluntary reporting survey conducted by
AAP's Section of Perinatal Pediatrics in 2000 revealed considerable
variability in capabilities and practice among the 880 units in the
United States that self-reported as Level III/subspecialty or Level
II/specialty neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Since state
governments regulate health care facilities and services, differences
among state regulatory requirements could explain the variability. The
article reports results of a review of operational terminology and
regulatory status for hospital neonatal services in the United States.
A systematic Web site search was conducted through June 2008 of
documents from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The search
identified hospital licensure requirements, state health facility
planning documents, state maternal and child health (MCH) services or
programs (via state Medicaid provider manuals or reimbursement
regulations as well as Title V block grant programs), and affiliated
non-governmental state perinatal health entities' publications. Data
extracted included (1) specific language of definitions for inpatient
neonatal care services, facilities, or units; (2) functional
capabilities of the level of care; (3) use criteria such as capacity,
unit or service volume, unit occupancy, and case mix; (4) regulatory
enforcement and compliance assessment; (5) funding linkages; and (6)
references to AAP's publications and policy statements.
The authors found that
- Thirty-three states define levels of hospital neonatal care
services. The range of levels terminology is broad, with states using
numbers, words, and combined designations. The defined levels of
service range from two to six.
- Although all 33 states that have defined levels of care include
language for increasing complexity of care, the descriptive language
varies broadly. Twenty-five states stipulate newborn characteristics,
restrictions on respiratory support, or specialized services such as
neonatal and cardiac surgery as descriptive of the functional
capabilities of the level of care.
- Nineteen states specify one or more use requirements for special
care. These use requirements can be grouped into four categories:
capacity, unit or service volume, unit occupancy, or case mix.
- For the 33 states with defined levels of neonatal services, the
definitions appear in five types of operational documents: hospital
licensure statutes and regulations, certificate of need application
requirements, state health plans, state health department-sponsored
program regulations, or affiliated nongovernmental program
publications. In 9 states the definitions appear in two or more
documents, and in 24 states they appear in one.
- States may use any of three options to regulate hospital
perinatal services -- facility licensure; state health facility
planning, expansion, or construction; and certification, in some
instances linked to client care funding.
- Some degree of linkage through either levels designation for
Medicaid coverage for NICU or MCH-funded services was confirmed for 11
states. Although many states reported MCH involvement in perinatal
health activities, funding for regional outreach was confirmed for only
three.
- AAP documents are cited as sources for state regulations or are
incorporated by reference in 22 states.
"Our review reveals that many states rely on GPC for guidance in
developing regulatory requirements for neonatal services," conclude the
authors. "However," they add, "the impact of the AAP policy statement
[Levels of Neonatal Care] in 2004 has been limited."
Blackmon LR, Barfield WD, Stark AR. 2009. Hospital neonatal services in
the United States: Variation in definitions, criteria, and regulatory
status, 2008. Journal of Perinatology 29(12):788-794. Abstract
available at http://www.nature.com/jp/journal/v29/n12/abs/jp2009148a.html.
************************************************************
3. FINDINGS EMPHASIZE THE IMPORTANCE OF INFLUENZA SURVEILLANCE
"St. Louis County, Missouri, experienced an unusually severe influenza
epidemic in 2007-2008, which was associated with an overall increase in
numbers of influenza cases across age groups and an atypically high
morbidity in young adults, reminiscent of the 1918-1919 pandemic
mortality curve," state the authors of an article published in the
December 15, 2009, issue of the American Journal of Epidemiology.
Seasonal influenza incidence varies with each annual influenza
epidemic; however, it is commonly believed that children and
adolescents have the highest age-group-specific incidence rates.
Typically, seasonal influenza produces a "U"-shaped mortality
distribution across age groups, disproportionately affecting young
children and the elderly. Deviations from the "U"-shaped curve were
observed during 20th-century influenza pandemics, most notably in
1918–1919, when increased mortality in young adults resulted in a
distinctive "W"-shaped age-distributed mortality curve. Community
surveillance is a key tool for estimating the burden of disease and
identifying unusual epidemiologic trends. The article presents an
analysis of cases of medically attended test-positive influenza (MATPI)
derived from data collected over a 10-year period (1998-2008) by the
St. Louis County Department of Health surveillance system.
The authors found that
- The overall MATPI incidence in St. Louis County for the 2007-2008
influenza season was 3.51 cases per 1,000 population. The 3,550
reported cases in St. Louis County were significantly greater than any
of the totals for the previous nine seasons.
- An influenza morbidity curve revealed an apparent central peak in
influenza incidence within the adolescent and young adult age groups.
- The 20-to-24-year-old age group had 4.4 times the number of MATPI
cases during the 2007-2008 influenza season as the aggregate seasonal
mean number of MATPI cases for the eight evaluable seasons, 1998-2004
and 2006-2008.
- Stratification by influenza type revealed that the central peak
in the 20-to-24-year-old age group was primarily due to influenza type
A.
- The influenza A MATPI incidence for the 20-to-24-year-old age
group in the 2007-2008 influenza season remained significantly higher
after adjustment for data source (hospital vs. nonhospital) in
comparison with the 15-to-19-year-old age group and the
25-to-29-year-old age group within the 2007-2008 season.
The authors conclude that "the uniqueness of surveillance data on the
2007-2008 influenza season underscores 1) the need for public health
departments to gather age-specific data and 2) the importance of public
reporting by health departments as an initial step for further
investigation into unique epidemiologic trends."
Georgantopoulos P, Bergquist EP, Knaup RC, et al. 2009. Importance of
routine public health influenza surveillance: Detection of an unusual
w-shaped influenza morbidity curve. American Journal of Epidemiology
170(12):1533-1540. Abstract available at http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/170/12/1533.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resource:
- Immunizations: Resource Brief at
http://mchlibrary.info/guides/immunization.html
************************************************************
4. STUDY EXAMINES USE OF ORAL HEALTH SERVICES AND ACCESS TO CARE AMONG
CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER
"Children [with autism spectrum disorder (ASD)] in Virginia face many
barriers to oral health care," state the authors of an article
published in the September-December 2009 issue of Journal of Dentistry
for Children. Increased understanding of the barriers to oral health
services for children with special health care needs has shown that
their access to services is more limited -- and their needs greater --
than for those without special health care needs. Children with ASD
present a unique challenge. ASD is accompanied by significant
impairments in social interaction and communication that may make
providing oral health care in a traditional manner difficult.
Determining the obstacles families face in obtaining oral health care
for their children can help to minimize the difficulties they
encounter. The article presents findings from a study to assess the use
of oral health services among children with ASD and identify barriers
that affect their access to care.
A questionnaire was mailed to all families in Virginia who were
registered with the Autism Program of Virginia (TAPVA) and who cared
for at least one child with ASD (n=200). The overall response rate was
29 percent (n=55). The analyses (1) described characteristics of
individual factors and oral health care access measures; (2) examined
relationships between the child's diagnosis, socioeconomic factors,
insurance type, history of behavior in the dental office, and oral
health care access measures; and (3) assessed factors independently
significant in terms of a child's ability to access care.
In the final analysis, the child's history of behavior in the dental
office (described as cooperative, somewhat cooperative, or extremely
uncooperative) and household income (described as less than $20,000;
$20,000 to $49,000, and $50,00 or more) were the only individual
factors that remained significant for two oral health care access
measures. The authors found that
- Children with ASD who displayed "extremely uncooperative"
behavior and whose families' incomes were between $20,000 and $49,000
were least likely to have a regular dentist.
- Children with ASD who displayed "extremely uncooperative"
behavior and whose families' incomes were between $20,000 and $49,000
were least likely to receive care when needed.
- There were no significant results found for the remaining dental
care access issues, which included the following: (1) When was your
child's last dental visit, (2) is your child currently scheduled for a
checkup within the next 12 months, and (3) has your child ever been
refused treatment.
The authors suggest that "these problems could be ameliorated through
improved training opportunities for dentists, and by increasing
parents' awareness of the need for early oral health intervention."
Brickhouse TH, Farrington FH, Best AM, et al. 2009. Barriers to dental
care for children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Dentistry
for Children 76(3):188-193. Abstract available at http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/aapd/jodc/2009/00000076/00000003/art00002.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resources:
- Autism Spectrum Disorders: Knowledge Path at
http://mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_autism.html
- Oral Health for Infants, Children, Adolescents, and Pregnant Women:
Knowledge Path at
http://mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_oralhealth.html
************************************************************
5. ARTICLE EXPLORES TRENDS AND FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH INFANT SLEEP
POSITION
"To reduce death rates, we must ensure that public health measures
reach the populations at highest risk and include messages that address
concerns about infant comfort or choking," write the authors of an
article published in the December 2009 issue of Archives of Pediatric
and Adolescent Medicine. Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) remains
the leading cause of postneonatal death in the United States. Placing
infants to sleep in the supine position has been associated with a
dramatic decrease in the SIDS rate since the Back to Sleep campaign
began in 1994. Despite this decrease, African-American infants continue
to have more than twice the incidence of SIDS as white infants and are
also less likely than white infants to be placed in the supine position
for sleep. This article examines trends in infant sleeping position,
seeks to understand factors associated with choice of infant sleeping
position, and identifies barriers to further change in practice using
data collected via the National Infant Sleep Position Survey (NISP), an
annual telephone survey conducted in 1993-2007.
The data used in the analysis for this study are part of the NISP, and
the sample was chosen to represent the 48 contiguous states (not
including Alaska and Hawaii). The dependent variable is based on the
response to the question, "do you have a position you usually place
your baby in"?
The authors found that
- Between 1993 and 2000, there was a clear increase in use of the
supine sleep position and a decrease in the prone position in each
racial and ethnic group.
- Throughout the 15-year study period, African-Americans
consistently had the lowest use of the supine sleep position and the
highest use of the prone position, compared with whites. Hispanics did
not significantly differ from whites regarding use of the prone
position for sleep.
- Since 2001, there has been little change in sleep position
practices. In the white and African-American populations, supine sleep
position reached a plateau of approximately 75 percent and 58 percent,
and prone sleep position reached a plateau of approximately 10 percent
and 20 percent, respectively.
- Survey year is the strongest predictor of supine sleep position.
Other characteristics associated with greater likelihood of reporting
usual supine sleep position include older maternal age, race other than
African-American, higher maternal educational level, higher maternal
income level, mother not having other children, geographic region other
than the Southern United States, older infant age, and infant being
born after more than 37 weeks’ gestation.
- In 2007, there were statistically fewer infants placed in the
supine position for sleep, compared with 2003.
- From 2003 to 2007, the difference in supine sleep position
between African-American and white infants can be explained, at least
in part, by caregiver concern about infant choking and comfort. While
the prevalence of concern about choking decreased markedly over time,
the relative importance of these attitudes as predictors of sleep
position increased.
The authors conclude that "we must remain vigilant about tracking
trends and parental attitudes about infant care practices, as we are
seeing evidence of slippage in adherence to . . . recommendations."
Colson ER, Rybin D, Smith LA, et al. 2009. Trends and factors
associated with infant sleeping position: The National Infant Sleep
Position Study, 1993-2007. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent
Medicine 163(12):1122-1128. Abstract available at http://archpedi.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/163/12/1122.
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resource:
- Infant Mortality and Pregnancy Loss: Knowledge Path at
http://mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_infmort.html
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line. You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Library shares notices of new issues of MCH Alert on Twitter at http://bit.ly/OKv5Y, via RSS Feed at http://twitter.com/statuses/user_timeline/21403022.rss,
and on Facebook at http://bit.ly/5hQew
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2009 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health under its cooperative agreement
(U02MC00001) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
MANAGING EDITOR: Jolene Bertness
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel
LIST ADMINISTRATOR: Beth DeFrancis Sun
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert
************************************************************