
Maternal and Child Health Library
MCH Alert: Focus on Infant Mortality is developed by the Maternal
and Child Health Library in collaboration with the National Sudden
and Unexpected Infant/Child and Pregnancy Loss Resource Center at
Georgetown University. This
and past issues are available online
at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html and http://www.sidscenter.org/alert/archives.html.
November 25, 2009
1. Bibliographies Feature Articles on Fetal Movement
Monitoring and on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and Air Pollution, Race
and Ethnicity, and Smoking
2. Brief Compares U.S. and European Infant Mortality
Rates
3. Authors Outline Strategies to Improve Care in the
Emergency Department for Women with Pregnancy Loss
4. Article Investigates Increase in Accidental Asphyxia
Deaths in Infancy
While Cosleeping in the State of Maryland
************************************************************
1. BIBLIOGRAPHIES FEATURE ARTICLES ON FETAL MOVEMENT MONITORING AND
ON SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME AND AIR POLLUTION, RACE AND ETHNICITY,
AND SMOKING
The National Sudden and Unexpected Infant-Child Death and Pregnancy
Loss Resource Center's Web site contains recently updated
bibliographies on the topics of air pollution, fetal movement
monitoring, and smoking, as well as on sudden infant death syndrome
(SIDS) in selected communities. Each bibliography presents definitions
and lists recent citations and abstracts from peer-reviewed journals.
The bibliographies also include a customized tool that can be used to
search PubMed for additional articles from MEDLINE and life science
journals. The bibliographies are available as follows:
* Air Pollution and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS): A Selected
Annotated Bibliography is available at http://www.sidscenter.org/TopicalBib/AirPollution.html.
* Fetal Movement Monitoring: A Selected Annotated Bibliography is
available at http://www.sidscenter.org/TopicalBib/FetalMovementMonitoring.html.
* Smoking and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS): A Selected Annotated
Bibliography is available at http://www.sidscenter.org/TopicalBib/Smoking.html.
* Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) in the African American
Community: A Selected Annotated Bibliography is available at http://www.sidscenter.org/TopicalBib/AfricanAmerican.html.
* Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) in American Indian-Alaska Native
Communities: A Selected Annotated Bibliography is available at http://www.sidscenter.org/TopicalBib/AmericanIndians.html.
* Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) in the Hispanic Community: A
Selected Annotated Bibliography is available at http://www.sidscenter.org/TopicalBib/Hispanic.html.
************************************************************
2. BRIEF COMPARES U.S. AND EUROPEAN INFANT MORTALITY RATES
Behind International Rankings of Infant Mortality: How the United
States Compares with Europe examines factors that determine the infant
mortality rate and different countries' requirements for reporting a
live birth to assess the possible effect on infant mortality data. The
brief, published by the National Center for Health Statistics, is based
on data from the Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set (United States) and
the European Perinatal Health Report. Contents include key findings;
figures, tables, and graphs; definitions; and data source and methods.
Data on infant mortality rates, reporting requirements, gestational
age-specific mortality rates, and the percentage of preterm births for
the United States and selected European countries are presented and
discussed. The authors also compare infant mortality rates for the
United States and Sweden and the U.S. infant mortality rate
standardized for Sweden's gestational age distribution. The brief is
available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db23.pdf.
************************************************************
3. AUTHORS OUTLINE STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE CARE IN THE EMERGENCY
DEPARTMENT FOR WOMEN WITH PREGNANCY LOSS
"Close collaboration between emergency and obstetric nurses and social
service providers is critical in order to provide holistic care for
patients experiencing pregnancy loss in the ED [emergency department],"
state the authors of an article published in the November-December 2009
issue of the Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing.
An estimated 175,000 women seek care for pregnancy loss every year in
the ED. For many women, the visit to the ED with pelvic pain or
bleeding may be the first and only clinical encounter during a
pregnancy. Priorities of care in the ED may present challenges for
nurses providing care to women experiencing a pregnancy loss. The
article examines how nurses can improve care for women with an early
pregnancy loss in the ED and highlights the role of nurses within a
holistic framework of collaborative care.
The researchers conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and
WEB OF KNOWLEDGE using the following keywords, alone or in combination:
pregnancy loss, abortion, miscarriage, vaginal bleeding, emergency
department, loss, and grief. The review focused on women's perceptions
and experiences, the standard of care for ED treatment, and grief
reactions following pregnancy loss. A synthesis of the literature
provided the foundation for the following framework that could be used
by both ED nurses and obstetric nurses in an effort to move toward more
holistic care for women and families experiencing loss:
- Ensure that a thorough history, physical, laboratory, and
diagnostic evaluation is completed.
- Deliver the information about pregnancy loss as soon as possible,
using patient-centered language that avoids the term "abortion."
- Encourage both the woman and significant others to grieve. Listen
and respond to immediate concerns.
- Warn women about the "anniversary phenomenon," that is, the
increased likelihood of experiencing depressive symptoms at the same
time of year as the loss or the expected delivery date.
- Counsel women to communicate their feelings of loss to family and
friends.
- In addition to providing an obstetric clinic referral for
follow-up, when possible, connect women with counselors who specialize
in pregnancy loss. Recognize that significant others may also have
emotional reactions that differ from the reactions of the woman who
experienced the loss.
- Identify how and where the woman gets her care and, if follow-up
care has not been set up, schedule an appointment for her within the
first week, or supply providers' names and phone numbers.
- Encourage the woman to write down what she wants to discuss at
the follow-up visit.
- Provide clear discharge instructions on normal signs of recovery
and a list of abnormal signs signaling that the woman should return to
the ED.
- Inform women and their families about the importance of
connecting with social networks such as church groups, support
organizations, or grief support groups. Provide resources and handouts,
as needed.
While "minimal information has been found regarding treatment of the
emotional aspects of pregnancy loss in the ED," state the authors,
"this fetal loss framework represents the first step in building a
collaborative model of health care."
Bacidore V, Warren N, Chaput C, et al. 2009. A collaborative framework
for managing pregnancy loss in the emergency department. Journal of
Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 38(6):730-738. Abstract
available at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122678652/abstract.
Readers: More information is available from the National Sudden and
Unexpected Infant-Child Death and Pregnancy Loss Resource Center's Web
site as follows:
- Bereavement Support at
http://www.sidscenter.org/Bereavement/index.html
- Pregnancy Loss, Miscarriage, and Stillbirth at
http://www.sidscenter.org/PregnancyLoss.html
************************************************************
4. ARTICLE INVESTIGATES INCREASE IN ACCIDENTAL ASPHYXIA DEATHS IN
INFANCY WHILE COSLEEPING IN THE STATE OF MARYLAND
"Our study shows that [the] number of infant deaths diagnosed as
accidental asphyxia, particularly involving . . . infants who were
cosleeping on couches/sofas and in adult beds, increased dramatically
in Maryland in 2003," write the authors of an article published in the
December 2009 issue of the American Journal of Forensic Medicine
Pathology. During the past decade, considerable attention has been
focused on the difficulties that exist in distinguishing between
unintentional or intentional suffocation (asphyxia) of an infant and
sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The study described in this
article highlights the importance of infant death scene investigation
and elucidates the potential risk of cosleeping for sudden unexpected
infant death, especially by accidental asphyxia. The shift of diagnosis
in sudden unexpected infant deaths is also discussed.
In 2003, a total of 102 infants (under age 1) who died suddenly and
unexpectedly in Maryland were investigated and autopsied by the Office
of the Chief Medical Examiner. The present study is based on a
retrospective review on the autopsy files of all 102 cases.
The authors found that
- Forty-four of the 102 infant deaths were due to natural causes,
including 21 SIDS cases. Fifteen deaths were the result of accident,
and 7 were homicide. The manner of death could not be determined in
more than one-third of the cases.
- Of the 102 cases, 46 were found cosleeping. Fifteen cosleeping
infants were white, and 29 were black.
- A majority of the cosleeping infants had a crib or bassinet
available at home.
- Only 24 infants were found sleeping alone in a crib or bassinet.
Infants were found on a sleep surface not designed for infants in 76
percent of cases. Forty-five infants were cosleeping at the time when
they were found unresponsive.
- Of the 21 SIDS infants, 11 were found unresponsive in a crib or
bassinet alone, 3 were sleeping alone in an adult bed, 4 were
cosleeping in an adult bed, 1 was sleeping alone on a couch, 1 was
sleeping in an infant swing, and 1 was sleeping in a mother's arms.
- Ten of the 11 asphyxia infants and 28 of 35 sudden unexplained
death in infancy (SUDI)/undetermined infants were cosleeping.
- Between 1993 and 2003, there was a sharp rise in accidental
asphyxia deaths in cosleeping infants in Maryland, rising from an
average of two cases per year before 2003 to 10 cases in 2003.
The authors conclude that "a more intense public education on these
avoidable and modifiable unsafe sleeping environments should be carried
out and efforts to get the information about the potentially fatal
consequences of cosleeping to the parents and caretakers should be
promoted."
Li L, Zhang Y, Zielke RH, et al. 2009. Observations on increased
accidental asphyxia deaths in infancy while cosleeping in the state of
Maryland. American Journal of Forensic Medicine Pathology
30(4):318-321. Abstract available at http://journals.lww.com/amjforensicmedicine/Abstract/2009/12000/Observations_on_Increased_Accidental_Asphyxia.2.aspx.
Readers: More information is available from the National Sudden and
Unexpected Infant-Child Death and Pregnancy Loss Resource Center's Web
site as follows:
- Safe Sleep at
http://www.sidscenter.org/SafeSleep/index.html
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not need to enter any text
in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. You do not need to enter any text
in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Library shares notices of new issues of MCH Alert on Twitter at http://bit.ly/OKv5Y, via RSS Feed at http://twitter.com/statuses/user_timeline/21403022.rss,
and on Facebook at http://bit.ly/5hQew
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2009 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert: Focus on Infant
Mortality is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health at Georgetown University under its
cooperative agreements
(U02MC00001 and U48MC08717) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau,
Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
MANAGING EDITOR: Jolene Bertness
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel
LIST ADMINISTRATOR: Beth DeFrancis Sun
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert
************************************************************