
Maternal and Child Health Library
This and past issues of the MCH Alert are available at http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert/archives.html
September 11, 2009
************************************************************
1. Tool Released to Help CYSHCN Leaders Assess State
Capacity
2. Issue Brief Examines State Maternal and Child Health
Program Response to H1N1
3. Report Explores the Role of Local Health Departments
in Addressing Adolescent Pregnancy and Parenting
4. Authors Analyze Patterns and Trends in Infant Mortality
5. Article Reviews the Implications of Caffeine for
Women's Health and Presents Data on Obstetrician-Gynecologists'
Knowledge and Practices
************************************************************
1. TOOL RELEASED TO HELP CYSHCN LEADERS ASSESS STATE CAPACITY
Examining State Capacity for Achieving a Community-Based Service System
for Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs (CYSHCN) is a
tool designed to help CYSHCN leaders assess a state's capacity to
implement community-based service systems. The tool, created by
Champions for Inclusive Communities (ChampionsInC), is structured
around the six performance measures for CYSHCN articulated in the Title
V Block Grant. For each measure, a team of state stakeholders can
identify (1) who are the needed partners at the state level; (2) what
state-level policies and practices should be in place to achieve the
outcomes; (3) how states can support community policies and practices;
and (4) what are some data sources or ways to measure achievements for
children, youth, and families. Resources for obtaining training and
technical assistance related to performance outcomes are provided at
the end of the document. The tool is available at http://www.championsinc.org/methods/assessment/Community_Level_Needs_Assess.pdf
************************************************************
2. ISSUE BRIEF EXAMINES STATE MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH PROGRAM
RESPONSE TO H1N1
The Role of State MCH Programs in H1N1 Response summarizes how Title V
programs were involved in preparedness and response activities during
the spring and summer H1N1 outbreak and how they will continue to help
with the response throughout the fall and winter. The issue brief,
based on a query of state MCH leaders in August 2009, was produced by
the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs' Emerging Issues
Committee with support from the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and the Health Resources and Services Administration's
Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Topics include staffing emergency or
pandemic operations centers; coordinating information dissemination and
prevention strategies related to H1N1 for pregnant women, infants, and
children, including children with special health care needs;
facilitating communication and coordinating response activities with
child care providers; assisting with school-closure decisions; updating
state pandemic preparedness plans; and serving as a liaison to
community and family groups. Select resources are included. The brief
is available at http://www.amchp.org/MCH-Topics/A-G/EmergencyPreparedness/Documents/Issue-Brief_FINAL.pdf
************************************************************
3. REPORT EXPLORES THE ROLE OF LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS IN ADDRESSING
ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY AND PARENTING
Meeting the Needs of Pregnant and Parenting Teens: Local Health
Department Programs and Services discusses the importance of addressing
the special needs of pregnant and parenting adolescents to improve
their own and their children's health and life outcomes. The report,
published by the National Association of City and County Health
Officials with support from the Health Resources and Services
Administration's Maternal and Child Health Bureau, provides background
information on the impact of adolescent childbearing and services and
programs for pregnant and parenting adolescents. To provide examples of
successful local programs aimed at pregnant and parenting adolescents,
the approaches of the following four local health departments are
described: Adolescent Family Life Program, San Mateo County Health
System and Santa Cruz County Health Department; the School and
Community Health Services Teen Pregnancy Teen Parenting Case Management
Program, the Montgomery County Department of Health and Human Services;
and the Teen Parent Program, St. Paul-Ramsey County Department of
Public Health. Challenges faced by programs targeting pregnant and
parenting adolescents, recommendations, and conclusions are also
presented. The report is available at
http://eweb.naccho.org/eweb/DynamicPage.aspx?WebCode=proddetailadd&ivd_qty=1&ivd_prc_prd_key=0151312e-1d97-4ea6-b514-9222443bc1b6&Action=Add&site=naccho&ObjectKeyFrom=1A83491A-9853-4C87-86A4-F7D95601C2E2&DoNotSave=yes&ParentObject=CentralizedOrderEntry&ParentDataObject=Invoice%20Detail
************************************************************
4. AUTHORS ANALYZE PATTERNS AND TRENDS IN INFANT MORTALITY
"Infant mortality is a complex and multifactorial problem that has
shown little improvement in the past several years, despite
programmatic efforts," write the authors of an article published in the
September-October 2009 issue of Public Health Reports. Infant mortality
is an important indicator of the health of a nation, as it is
associated with a variety of factors such as maternal health, quality
of and access to medical care, socioeconomic conditions, and public
health practices. The U.S. infant mortality rate generally declined
throughout the 20th century, but recent data suggest at least a
temporary halt in this decline in the first few years of the 21st
century. This article analyzes patterns and trends in U.S. infant
mortality.
Data discussed in this article are based primarily on the linked
birth/infant death datasets produced by the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics. The authors
computed infant mortality rates per 100,000 live births by cause of
death (COD) and per 1,000 live births for all other variables. Infant
mortality rates and other measures of infant health were analyzed and
compared. Leading and preterm-related CODs and international
comparisons of infant mortality rates were also examined.
The authors found that
- The infant mortality rate declined by 93 percent during the 20th
century, from approximately 100 infant deaths per 1,000 live births in
1900 to 6.89 in 2000.
- The infant mortality rate was 6.86 in 2005, not significantly
different from the rate of 6.89 in 2000.
- Large variations in infant mortality rates among racial and
ethnic groups remain. Non-Hispanic black mothers had the highest infant
mortality rate (13.63), followed by Puerto Rican (8.30) and American
Indian (8.06) mothers.
- The percentage of low-birthweight (less than 2,500 g) births
increased from a low of 6.8 percent in 1985 to 7.6 percent in 2000 and
8.2 percent in 2005. However, from 1985 to 2000, birthweight-specific
infant mortality rates declined for all birthweight categories.
- The infant mortality rate from congenital malformations decreased
by 5 percent from 2000 to 2005, and the sudden infant death syndrome
(SIDS) rate decreased by 13 percent, although this change may be due in
part to changes in the way SIDS is diagnosed. However, for CODs with a
high percentage of deaths to low-birthweight infants, infant mortality
rates either plateaued or increased from 2000 to 2005.
- In 2005, 10,364 out of a total of 28,384 infant deaths in the
United States were due to preterm-related CODs. The percentage of
infant deaths that were preterm-related increased from 35 percent in
2000 to 37 percent in 2005.
- The United States' international ranking in infant mortality fell
from 12th lowest in 1960 to 23rd lowest in 1990.
The authors conclude that "further efforts to lower the U.S. infant
mortality rate should focus on preventing preterm and low birthweight
deliveries and on reducing the large and persistent differences in
infant mortality rates by race and ethnicity."
MacDorman MF, Mathews TJ. 2009. The challenge of infant mortality: Have
we reached a plateau? Public Health Reports 124(5):670-681. Available
to subscribers at http://www.publichealthreports.org/userfiles/124_5/670-681.pdf
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resource:
- Infant Mortality and Pregnancy Loss: Knowledge Path at
http://mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_infmort.html
************************************************************
5. ARTICLE REVIEWS THE IMPLICATIONS OF CAFFEINE FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH AND
PRESENTS DATA ON OBSTETRICIAN-GYNECOLOGISTS' KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICES
"Our study confirms that physicians frequently counsel patients to
reduce or eliminate caffeine use during pregnancy . . . . However,
there was great variability in what was considered to be 'high levels'
or 'safe levels' of caffeine use for pregnant women," state the authors
of an article published in the September 2009 issue of the Journal of
Women's Health. Although it is acknowledged that additional research is
needed to clarify limits of caffeine consumption during pregnancy,
major health reviews have suggested that pregnant women or women trying
to conceive should limit their caffeine consumption to no more than 300
mg per day. As obstetricians and gynecologists (ob-gyns) continue to
provide an expanding range of care to women, their knowledge about and
awareness of caffeine's general effects on health and psychological
well-being is becoming more significant to their practice. This report
describes a survey to examine knowledge and beliefs about caffeine
among ob-gyns as well as their assessment and advice practices
pertaining to caffeine use in pregnant and nonpregnant women.
A total of 785 members of the American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists' Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network were invited
to participate in a cross-sectional survey that asked about their
beliefs and knowledge related to caffeine's effects and their
assessment and advice to pregnant and nonpregnant clients concerning
caffeine use. The first mailing was sent in June 2007, and second and
third mailings were sent to nonresponders between July and August 2007.
Ob-gyns were asked about demographics and personal caffeine
consumption, caffeine knowledge, and caffeine assessment and advice.
The authors found that
- A total of 386 ob-gyns returned the survey, a response rate of
49.1 percent.
- Respondents largely overestimated the amount of caffeine in a
serving of espresso, with only 14.3 percent providing a value in the
accepted range. Accurate estimates for a serving of coffee, tea, and
Diet Coke were provided by 66.70 percent, 63.90 percent, and 57.80
percent of respondents, respectively.
- When asked to report what was considered to be "high levels of
maternal caffeine consumption," 15.8 percent wrote that they did not
know, and 52.6 percent left the question blank.
- Ninety-six percent of those who provided an answer correctly
indicated that caffeine can be passed through breast milk; however,
only 24.8 percent indicated that the metabolism of caffeine slows as
women progress through pregnancy.
- More than half of the respondents (61.7 percent) advise some
clients to consume caffeine during pregnancy for the following reasons:
alleviate headaches (51.8 percent), relieve caffeine withdrawal
symptoms (32.8 percent), improve mood (2.8 percent), and other (4
percent).
"We hope that this article serves to increase knowledge of caffeine and
its clinically relevant pharmacological effects and recommend the
development of practice guidelines for ob-gyns and other health care
providers," conclude the authors.
Anderson BL, Juliano LM, Schulkin J. 2009. Caffeine's implications for
women's health and survey of obstetrician-gynecologists' caffeine
knowledge. Journal of Women's Health 18(9):1457-1466. Abstract
available at http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/jwh.2008.1186
Readers: More information is available from the following MCH Library
resource:
Preconception and Pregnancy: Knowledge Path at
http://www.mchlibrary.info/KnowledgePaths/kp_pregnancy.html
************************************************************
To subscribe to MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe from MCH Alert, send an e-mail message to MCHAlert-request@lists.mchgroup.org with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line. You do not need to enter any text in the body of the message.
************************************************************
MCH Library shares notices of new issues of MCH Alert on Twitter at http://bit.ly/OKv5Y, via RSS Feed at http://twitter.com/statuses/user_timeline/21403022.rss,
and on Facebook at http://bit.ly/5hQew
************************************************************
MCH Alert © 1998-2009 by National Center for Education in Maternal
and
Child Health and Georgetown University. MCH Alert is produced by
Maternal and Child Health Library at the National Center for Education
in Maternal and Child Health under its cooperative agreement
(U02MC00001) with the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health
Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The Maternal and Child Health Bureau reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable right to use the work for
federal purposes and to authorize others to use the work for federal
purposes.
Permission is given to forward MCH Alert, in its entirety, to others.
For
all other uses, requests for permission to duplicate and use all or
part of the information contained in this publication should be sent to mchalert@ncemch.org.
The editors welcome your submissions, suggestions, and questions.
Please contact us at the address below.
MANAGING EDITOR: Jolene Bertness
CO-EDITOR: Tracy Lopez
COPYEDITOR/WRITER: Ruth Barzel
LIST ADMINISTRATOR: Beth DeFrancis Sun
MCH Alert
Maternal and Child Health Library
Georgetown University
Box 571272
Washington, DC 20057-1272
Phone: (202) 784-9770
Fax: (202) 784-9777
E-mail: mchalert@ncemch.org
Web site: http://www.mchlibrary.info/alert
************************************************************